Talk:GN-z11

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the GN-z11 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Cosmology Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Cosmology task force.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A news item involving GN-z11 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 8 March 2016.

Wikipedia

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Observable universe#Misconceptions on its size|Misconceptions about the size of the observable universe]] The anchor (#Misconceptions on its size) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

apparently, it's not a galaxy as per Oct. 8th 2021 news

https://www.space.com/oldest-gamma-ray-burst-space-junk-mistake all the 'work' done on this page is junk too — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.246.48.3 (talk) 06:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The news is that what looked like a gamma-ray burst in GN-z11 was instead probably a reflection off space debris. It has nothing to do with the status of GN-z11 as a galaxy. - Mysterius (talk) 22:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stream of information

I know the page looks like shit right now, (I created it, so being honest), but Yale's full findings will be published in a few days, so we can expand and formalize to a comprehensive extent then. I can't wait to include the infobox information that's not yet available! DARTHBOTTO_talk•cont 08:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for the page and colorful language — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.51.113.90 (talk) 00:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I hope either one helped you. DARTHBOTTO_talk•cont 03:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Understanding distances and speeds

I've reworded your "Note 1" to show how the ratio of distances matches the expansion factor given by 1+redshift. The rate at which the galaxy is receding in terms of rate of change of proper distance is more than double the speed of light so I'm wondering if quoting the "Heliocentric radial velocity" is perhaps misleading for lay readers. What is your opinion? George Dishman (talk) 12:33, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth citation

The fourth citation seems to be acting weird for me. Rather than link me what it says it links to, it links to rebelmouse.com. -174.141.135.242 (talk) 22:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that some Discovery.com content is now at Seeker.com. I changed the citation. (I discovered this by a redirect in the Wayback Machine.) Davemck (talk) 18:59, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Video about the suspected gamma ray burst (the flash)

I did just watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUj0rTyaSQc

Might be interesting somewhere?

--Codegrinder (talk) 07:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Helio radial velocity not in line with other most distant astronomical objects

Hello,

The Helio radial velocity given here, sourced from Sindbad, doesn't seem correct. In other most distant astronomical objects (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_the_most_distant_astronomical_objects) this is simply "cz", here it is something else.

cz is also available in Sindbad :3057883, and should be quoted here. It can also be sourced from NED (https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/byname?objname=GN-z11&hconst=67.8&omegam=0.308&omegav=0.692&wmap=4&corr_z=1), perhaps a bit more precise: 3324698.825000 +/- 35975.100000

The Helio Radial Velocity data for:

MACS1149-JD1 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/MACS1149-JD1 EGSY8p7 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/EGSY8p7 EGS-zs8-1 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/EGS-zs8-1

Are consistently as cz.

As GN-Z11 is not (it's difficult to say what it is, it might be an invalid entry in Sindbad), it is quite misleading.

Kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jan Niedośpiał (talk • contribs) 14:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Life

Is there like on it 204.141.212.61 (talk) 16:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

let me take a trip over there and ask, ya? 2600:6C47:A0F0:8390:18FF:D3F:CBB4:6BAC (talk) 14:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]