Talk:Function of a real variable

Banach spaces

Should we mention that most of these things (limits, derivatives, etc.) can be performed in Banach spaces? What about absolute continuity? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brirush (talk • contribs) 19:48, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, should include absolute continuity.

About Banach spaces: Possibly, near the end.

I'm not familiar with Banach spaces, so please feel free to keep up the good work! Thanks for expanding this article. For now I just used up my free time editing this article... M∧Ŝc²ħε И_τlk 20:19, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Continuity and limit

You wrote

Until the second part of 19th century, only continuous functions were considered by mathematicians.

I don't believe it. For example https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Floor_and_ceiling_functions states

Carl Friedrich Gauss introduced the square bracket notation [ x] for the floor function in his third proof of quadratic reciprocity (1808).

More to the point, in the definition of limit you use the condition $d(x,a)<\delta$ where all other definitions I have seen use $0<d(x,a)<\delta$ . This completely alters the meaning. In particular the following sentence

If $a$ is in the interior of the domain, the limit exists if and only if the function is continuous at $a$ .

is false with the orthodox definition.

With the orthodox definition, any real number would pass as a limit at the isolated points of $X$ if these were included as candidates for $a$ so the range of candidates is normally taken as the set of limit points of $X$ rather than the topological closure of $X$ .

Also the restriction of points of continuity to the interior of the function's domain seems unnecessary and, I think, also unorthodox. In Apostol's "Mathematical Analysis", for example, a function can be continuous at any point of the domain - he specifically mentions that a function is continuous at any isolated point in its domain. Martin Rattigan (talk) 02:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Differentiability

Two issues: is there a difference between "derivable" and "differentiable"? It seems like "derivable" is just a seldom used synonym, unless I am misunderstanding this sentence. Also "It is often implicitly assumed that the function is derivable in some interval." Really? By whom? 67.186.58.77 (talk) 07:38, 10 May 2018 (UTC) Alsosaid1987 (talk) 07:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it is better to replace "derivable" by "differentiable". However the words are not exactly synonym. One means "having a derivative", the other means "having a differential". This is the same in the case of one variable, but not in general. I'll try to find a better formulation for avoiding "assuming". D.Lazard (talk) 08:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]