Jump to content

Talk:Fulton Street station (New York City Subway)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
See also: Talk:Fulton Street Transit Center

A note on edit history

[edit]

Article title wars are depressingly common in the NYCS project, and this page has suffered more than most. It has probably been known by 4 or 5 different names.

The original edit history can be found at Broadway-Nassau-Fulton Streets (New York City Subway). For a while, the description of the station was co-mingled with the article describing the Fulton Street Transit Center project, and additional edit history can be found there. Marc Shepherd 21:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this is non-rhetorical, but I'll respond anyway. I agree with you. This article has received massive abuse regarding naming, but it should end here. I replaced the en dash with a hyphen because en dashes are not to be used in article titles. See WP:NC#Special characters. –Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs • email) 23:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I generally agree with this name; I think dropping the final "Street" is a bit more common, but the individual station does use it, so it's no big deal. --NE2 03:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Common or not, this is the final choice, and I hope no more trouble is stirred up with naming issues. –Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs • email) 03:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is the "final choice" for this article. And if they MTA does in fact rename it once the project is finished, it's not. --NE2 04:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted a message regarding this at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen, where I requested a page history merge. Please check my message there if there's anything I missed. Tinlinkin 05:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no objections, so will move once the redirect is deleted. Kotniski (talk) 19:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fulton Street / Broadway – Nassau Street (New York City Subway) → Fulton Street (New York City Subway) — The Broadway – Nassau Street portion of the complex has been renamed to Fulton Street. [1] Acps110 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the name has been officially changed, I don't see a problem. On an unrelated note, the layout of this article is cluttered and confusing. I hesitate to tamper with it, but I wish something can be done with it. ScottyBerg (talk) 20:55, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What about the dab page that's currently at the proposed title?--Kotniski (talk) 09:03, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That dab page is unnecessary. Fulton Street contains the exact same information and can be linked via a hatnote. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Don't forget that a page Fulton Street Transit Center exists already. Merger? — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:36, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't like the idea of merging the pages together until construction is complete and FTC actually opens. The two articles have very different scopes. The Fulton Street (New York City Subway) page covers the active station complex with all of its problems and the Fulton Street Transit Center covers the demolition and construction of a new unified complex. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FTC is different than Fulton Street. Even the tiles on the A/C platform have been renamed to Fulton Street, irrespective of the fact that the unified centre hasn't been finished. I agree with the move, but it should be clear that Broadway-Nassau was formerly part of the name. Geoking66talk 19:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this is obvious to New Yorkers, but I don't see how the proposed title distinguishes this site from Fulton Street (IND Crosstown Line).--Kotniski (talk) 13:29, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed title comes from the station naming convention of the WikiProject – New York City Public Transportation. The parenthetical New York City Subway is used because it is a station complex on multiple lines portrayed on the map as a single entity with all platforms using the same name. To distinguish from the Crosstown line, a hatnote is at the top of the page leading to a disambiguation page. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 13:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, if that's the convention, I won't object. Can we get round to doing this now? Is everyone happy with the proposal? (With the possibility of a merge in the future.)--Kotniski (talk) 16:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fulton Street (New York City Subway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fulton Street (New York City Subway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:20, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
Passed. ZKang123 (talk) 23:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Fulton Street station (New York City Subway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 05:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will also take on this review, but after I finished reviewing 14th Street–Union Square station.--ZKang123 (talk) 05:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Early comments and lead

[edit]
  • Images are generally free-use or in public domain
  • Earwig shows no outstanding issues beyond repeated common phrases (e.g. line or place names)
  • The complex comprises four stations, all named Fulton Street. – I felt this sentence is unnecessary given it's alr stated earlier that "It consists of four linked stations"
  • "the final one in the complex to be completed, opening on February 1, 1933" – "latest to be completed and opened on February 1, 1933"
  • "in 2019, with 27,715,365 passengers." – remove comma

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 12:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History

[edit]

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 12:50, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dual contracts

[edit]

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 10:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IND expansion

[edit]

20th-century improvements

[edit]

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 03:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21st century

[edit]

Station layout

[edit]

Platform layouts (Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line, Nassau Street Line, Lexington Avenue Line platforms)

[edit]

Overall comments

[edit]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Putting article on hold.--ZKang123 (talk) 07:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review ZKang123. I think I've finally fixed the remaining issues. Epicgenius (talk) 14:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 14:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
Entrance to the Fulton Street station
Entrance to the Fulton Street station

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 13:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Fulton Street station (New York City Subway); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Epicgenius: Good article. You used a wrong citation for alt0 but I found the correct one in the article so it's good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fulton_Street_station_(New_York_City_Subway)&oldid=1207342151"