Jump to content

Talk:Fulton Street station (New York City Subway)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 05:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will also take on this review, but after I finished reviewing 14th Street–Union Square station.--ZKang123 (talk) 05:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Early comments and lead

[edit]
  • Images are generally free-use or in public domain
  • Earwig shows no outstanding issues beyond repeated common phrases (e.g. line or place names)
  • The complex comprises four stations, all named Fulton Street. – I felt this sentence is unnecessary given it's alr stated earlier that "It consists of four linked stations"
  • "the final one in the complex to be completed, opening on February 1, 1933" – "latest to be completed and opened on February 1, 1933"
  • "in 2019, with 27,715,365 passengers." – remove comma

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 12:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History

[edit]

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 12:50, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dual contracts

[edit]

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 10:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IND expansion

[edit]

20th-century improvements

[edit]

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 03:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21st century

[edit]

Station layout

[edit]

Platform layouts (Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line, Nassau Street Line, Lexington Avenue Line platforms)

[edit]

Overall comments

[edit]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Putting article on hold.--ZKang123 (talk) 07:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review ZKang123. I think I've finally fixed the remaining issues. Epicgenius (talk) 14:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.