Talk:French submarine Mariotte/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 20:00, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Anything you could add to clarify what the drop collars are for non-experts? I don't think we have a link, unfortunately.
I wish that I did, nothing beyond the name in any of my sources.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
I'd assume the patrols off Provence were to defend against an attack by Goeben/Breslau?
Probably, but uncertain since her logbook covering this time was lost with the boat.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
File:MARIOTTE xxx 1a.jpg - is there a better source for this? I didn't see anything on the forum that said it was from a postcard (though I didn't look very hard)
Replaced with a scan of the postcard.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Franse-duikboot-WO-I.jpg - needs a source
Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

ping--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoops, I had started looking at this the other day and then got distracted. Everything looks good to me, so passing now. Parsecboy (talk) 20:33, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]