Talk:Forth and Clyde Junction Railway

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Forth and Clyde Junction Railway article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Trains: in UK / in Scotland Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland (assessed as Mid-importance).

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Double or single track?

Double or signle track?

Tabletop 04:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't say for sure but I suspect it was probably single. PatGallacher 12:16, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Is there a reason why the map is upside down? Shipsview (talk) 09:15, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The railway ran east from the Balloch (top of the route diagram) to Stirling (bottom of the diagram). The key point to note is that this is a route diagram not a map. --Stewart^{(talk | edits)} 19:21, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly, railways operating from London to York, etc, have London at the bottom of the diagram. Indeed, I cannot find any others that are not laid out geographically. Shipsview (talk) 21:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Geographically the RDT would have to be laid out left to right as the line is west to east. As the major station on the line is at Stirling having it at the bottom seems logical. I can not see why you wish to have Balloch at the bottom, to my mind it seem most illogical. Looking at other east/west routes in Central Scotland, there appears to be a 50/50 split to those which are east at the top and east at the bottom. --Stewart^{(talk | edits)} 22:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]