Talk:Forevermore (Whitesnake album)

Forevermore World Tour was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 08 February 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Forevermore (Whitesnake album). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Rock music

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Date format

This page uses Day-Month-Year (DD/MM/YYYY) formatting for the dates. Do NOT change it

Hard rock albums category

I removed the category Hard rock albums. The whole Whitesnake albums category is in the category Hard rock albums. Ostalocutanje (talk) 19:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. No need for it to be basically double-listed, I suppose--L1A1 FAL (talk) 21:04, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uk chart pos

It says on this page that the album was #12 in the UK and on the 'whitesnake discography' page that it was #33. Which of these is the truth? (or did it jump from 33 to 12 or something?) I know this is sorta small detail, but I was just curious and got confused. Cheers 62.107.113.126 (talk) 21:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to check that out. Thanks for bringing it up--L1A1 FAL (talk) 22:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would tend to say that #33 is probably correct, because that is the only one that was cited. Changed the charting position box here to reflect that. Thanks again for pointing out the issue. Regards, --L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]