Talk:For the Glory

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Outfolded (3 participants)
NoFrag (1 participant)
VoxelStorm (0 participants)
GameRevolution (5 participants)
List of longest-running video game franchises (11 participants)
Atomas (1 participant)
PLAY: The Games Festival (3 participants)
FloodSim (3 participants)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (2 participants)
Blast Monkeys (2 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants; relisted)
Gilman Louie (3 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (5 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

WP:VG assessment

Good work! Definitely a C-class article now. Usually when I post an assessment I give a mini-review of the article with some points for improvement, but all I can really say with this article is that you just need to keep expanding in each area where appropriate.

The gameplay section looks pretty much finished, although I'd suggest mentioning the setting of the game here (basic rule is any info in the lead section should be somewhere else in the article). If the game's appearance is radically different from that in the preview image I'd suggest getting a new screenshot. I'd also suggest trimming some of the sentences of excessive words, e.g. However, multiplayer stability issues, laborious management, and irritating sound effects soured opinions. can just be The game was criticized for its multiplayer stability issues, laborious management, and irritating sound effects; For example, the previously mentioned AGCEEP modification doesn't need the "For example".

Otherwise, look at other featured/good video game articles (bottom of WP:VG) to get an idea of what to do. If you have any questions, go ahead and ask. Hope this helps, Una Laguna^Talk 10:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on For the Glory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100205075155/http://www.gamersdailynews.com/article-2314-For-the-Glory-Review-PC.html to http://www.gamersdailynews.com/article-2314-For-the-Glory-Review-PC.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]