Talk:Flashforward (novel)

Novels: Sci-fi Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Flashforward (novel) Hardback cover.jpg

Image:Flashforward (novel) Hardback cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot discussion, second flash forward

I read the occurrences of the second flashforward differently an they are described in this article. I took it that those people who experience a flash the second ti e actually experience a series of flashes that stretch into the future. Because each flash is separated by several decades, most people only experience the first flash briefly and then are dead at subsequent flash points. Lloyd experiences the whole series as if they were a movie following him through time. This article currently describes a single flash the is so far in the future that only Lloyd experiences it. Any comments on how other people interpreted these events? ronningt (talk) 13:08, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pope Benedict

I'm confused by the bit of the article that states: "In a "NewsFlash" in the novel, Pope Benedict XVI (who was pope when the novel takes place, but not when it was written) reserves judgement on whether the Flashforward was a miracle or not."

Is this saying that Benedict was actually named specifically in a novel written 6 years before his election? Some clarification around this point would be great. -- 50.92.203.209 (talk) 09:20, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's what it says (see http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_fictional_clergy_and_religious_figures#Popes) Laz (talk) 19:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]