Talk:Flåm Line

Flåm Line has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 6, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 17, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Flåm Line, originally operated with El 9 locomotives, is the steepest standard gauge railway in Europe?

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 16, 2012

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Flåmsbana map.

Operator

Trains on this line is operated by Flåm Utvikling AS (see [1]), but I believe/assume the railway itself is owned by "Jernbaneverket". Listing Norges Statsbaner as the operator is completely wrong. Vibrog (talk) 18:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Operator" refers to who operates the trains, not the infrastructure, which is listed as "owner". Arsenikk ^(talk) 12:03, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tunnels [2] -- Vibrog (talk) 07:43, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Flåm Line/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 09:40, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add the coordinates?♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Myrdal doesn't link to a settlement.
- I've fixed the link and I'll make an article when I have a little more time. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Route

Myrdal link needs fixing.
The digits you've added like 20.20, 2.20, 4.40 etc I think the zero is superfluous and it would be better as 20.2, 2.2, 4.4 etc.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:48, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- All the distances are measured by 10-meter intervals, so the 0 becomes part of the number of significant digits. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"the valley widens and changes character, becoming flatter and filled with more contrast." What is meant by "filled with more contrast"?♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I've rephrased a little; although not as true to the source, I it definitively accurate, as the upper part of the line as more barren. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

History

The currency figures. It would be useful to see some currency conversion into dollars or something as NOK 3.5 million could be anything! I think it would give non Norwegian readers a better perspective. Although historical conversions may be significantly different. Just a suggestion anyway.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have come across this discussion before, and there is consensus that conversion, particularly of historical values, will not give an encyclopedic result without bias. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Operations

"By then ridership had reached 175,000" What do you mean? 175,000 passengers per annum? Can you reword to make clearer?♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:40, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Section has quite a few red links. Do you plan on blue linking any?♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the links (Gudvangen Tunnel, B3, Myrdal) are on my short list, the others I might create one day; they are all clearly notable topics. I no longer really like to create many stub articles, instead preferring somewhat longer articles, thus I don't "fill inn" as many red links any more. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the review. Sorry for the delay, but I am traveling and have limited access to the Internet. I will probably not be able to follow up on any issues until I return home on 5 April. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Seems to meet requirements.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:37, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Flåm Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1195
Corrected formatting/usage for http://train.raildude.com/the-flam-railway/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.flaamsbana.no/eng/Index.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1195
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.flamsbana-museet.no/visartikkel.asp?art=302
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.jernbaneverket.no/no/dokumenter/Om-oss/Jernbanestatistikk/Jernbanestatistikk-2008/
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5zGHtdsJD?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flaamsbana.no%2Feng%2FIndex.html to http://www.flaamsbana.no/eng/Index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Flåm Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.flamsbana-museet.no/visartikkel.asp?art=302
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.flaamsbana.no/eng/Index.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724175723/http://www.flamsbana-museet.no/default.asp?sprak=3 to http://www.flamsbana-museet.no/default.asp?sprak=3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

rolling stock is outdated

it is no longer using El 17 but El 18.84.212.111.156 (talk) 00:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]