Jump to content

Talk:Five Fingers Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Missing finger?

[edit]

The article states the Five Fingers Group is named for the fingers of a hand. However, there's only four fingers listed. Is there a finger missing? Black Tusk (talk) 21:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's a thumb....still not a finger LOL.....we flew close to it an a flight in or out can't remember which; pretty amazing looking.Skookum1 (talk) 16:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remote and inaccessible....and mostly in the Coquitlam watershed

[edit]

So off limits, that is; its outer NW summits might be accessible from Indian Arm; getting to it from Widgeon would, I think, traverse watershed; that's the reason this isn't seen and/or more widely photographed; illegal for the most part to get at, as well as physically extreme approachesSkookum1 (talk) 16:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Five Fingers Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]