Talk:First Student UK
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge
[edit]This article is one of three aticles about the operations of First Student, a subsidiary of First Group in one of three geographies. Each article lacks context and should be merged into a single article with three sections.
|► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 04:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]The articles recently added to this article do little to substantiate the notability of "First Student UK". In most articles, there is no mention of any First entity at all. Those that do mention First, often talk about "First Group" or "First". What establishes the notability and distinctiveness of "First Student UK". I see that branding nowhere in any reference. This article seems mostly focused on why yellow school buses are not widespread in Britain. What makes this small part of First Group notable on its own and not really part of another article?|► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 05:57, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Taking 8,000 students to and from school in the UK, every day, across England, Scotland and Wales. A former home secretary being involved. All things that I'd say make it notable. I accept that the "First Student UK" branding isn't often seen, but in each individual operating area "UK" isn't applicable, and the media interest is in yellow school buses, not what the brand name is. Arriva436talk/contribs 21:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Keep-ish: the article is a good read... but is it really about First Student UK? A concern is that the innovation (in the UK) of dedicated school-only bus transport might derive from the funding authorities rather than the First company. The article dwells mainly on the quality issues surrounding the previous bus services and the improvements sought with a dedicated fleet. A similar story as that of HCT Group Mybus services in West Yorkshire; once again, although that bus company would, I am sure, love to take the credit, the initiative really arose from the education sector, or at least would not have occurred without the sector's support.
All of the above concerns would be solved by: Move the article to Dedicated school buses in the United Kingdom. As Arriva436 said above, ...and the media interest is in yellow school buses, not what the brand name is. Nankai (talk) 21:54, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
I'm inclined to agree at least in part with the move proposed above. The best sourced section of this article is the bit that has no connection to First at all, so it's fairly clear that an article of that type is needed. However, that would require a major rewrite that may well remove a lot of useful content. So I'm tempted to say that we should try the following:
- Move the 'Background' section to a new article Dedicated school buses in the United Kingdom and expand it with any relevant content (there should be plenty to go round).
Merge the other two sections, First Student Canada and First Student (United States) into an expanded First Student article and remove some of the inevitable duplication.
What do others think? Alzarian16 (talk) 08:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- OK, I just discovered the discussion at Talk:First Student, and clearly a full merge could never get consensus (and for pretty good reasons). I still believe my first point was a good one, but here's a better suggestion for the remainder:
- Expand the article to include Ride Pegasus!, the First school bus operation in Berkshire, which has plenty of media coverage and isn't covered in any detail at all on Wikipedia.
I think this could be a very good way to improve the situation, but I'd like to see what other users think before I try it. Alzarian16 (talk) 20:48, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Good idea. The reason that the First Student UK article has a lot of background info is because someone came along and said it wasn't notable, so I made it notable with the references. There is definitely enough stuff to have a First Student UK article, it just a case of finding more info. I think including Ride Pegasus is a good idea, especially with the details of them running part of the Guildford park and ride and the assessbus services, which can be tied in to the issue of dedicated school buses doing nothing between the peaks. I've got plenty of photos too...
- There's loads of media coverage about the withdrawal of RP. See the Surrey CC notice [1]. The cabinet report about its withdrawal will be on the site somewhere, if you're brave enough to use the search function! Then there's all the Surrey Advertiser articles... [2]. So plenty of stuff to have a combined article. Arriva436talk/contribs 21:01, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- OK, done the Pegasus bit. Now we just need someone to create the new page. Alzarian16 (talk) 13:38, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on First Student UK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5vPjhJpEJ?url=http://www.firstgroup.com/ukbus/southeast/berkshirethames/about/index.php to http://www.firstgroup.com/ukbus/southeast/berkshirethames/about/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Defunct
[edit]I've changed the tense of the article from "is" to "was" - The official site no longer exists and looking on Flickr a few vehicles have been used as staff shuttles or have been sold entirely. There's nothing on the First website and results thus far have been the US division. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)