Talk:Finasteride/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Autoimmune disease

Some anon added autoimmune disease as a complication[1]. Not a single study is reported on PubMed. Sounds like a myth. The mechanism is also not explained, nor is there any truth in his assertions that Alzheimer's, heart disease and skin cancer are "autoimmune diseases". JFW | T@lk 14:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

poison

Thanks to whoever deleted the "Beware: Propecia is pure poision..." section... I was about to delete it, but you beat me to it! -cmsmith81 (I am not signed in). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.253.87.96 (talk) 05:38, 8 July 2007‎ (UTC)

• "In internet discussion groups, some men report side-effects lasting long after cessation of the drug, such as difficulty concentrating, testicular pain, and frequent urination. It is uncertain whether these problems can be attributed to finasteride." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nectarflowed (talk • contribs) 08:53, 17 June 2005‎ (UTC)

Re Par.3..."Further, finasteride increased the specificity and selectivity of prostate cancer detection, thus, a seemingly increased rate of high Gleason grade tumor."

This statement is inaccurate and critically misleading. A Gleason score (not "grade") is determined by a trained technician or physician examining, by microscope, tissue samples obtained by biopsy. There is no way a drug (as opposed to a selective stain) can influence this visual evaluation of the "aggressiveness" of cancer cells which are present. Thus, finasteride increases (not "seemingly increases") the probability of a high Gleason score and a prostate cancer's aggressiveness. <Wolf Lorber (not registered).

What about this - "One hypothesized explanation for this increase is that finasteride reduced prostate volume, leading to detection of more high-grade tumors due to increased sampling density." http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/99/18/1366 Pondle 15:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Depression

Finasteride has been linked to depression, this should be included

http://www.leaddiscovery.co.uk/admin%20gu/files/14467.asp

http://www.hairsite4.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=10&topic_id=5980&mode=full —The preceding unsigned comment was added by My phantom limb (talk • contribs) 14:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC).

This could be due to a confounding variable - hair loss.Pondle 10:58, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

The two cited studies describe moderate to severe clinical depression as classified using verifiable tests (see sources) in a majority (!) of examined cases. This is very different from frustration about hair loss. Personally, I have quit Finasteride after only 2 months due to recurring symptoms of depression the like of which I had never even imagined before. I would not have related this to Finasteride if I had not seen other users on internet forums reporting similar experiences. Even if many may use Finasteride without any effect on their mental well-being, depression should not be taken lightly as a possible side-effect, even though the producer's information leaflet does not (yet?) mention it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.225.92.116 (talk) 22:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

You see a lot of claims about alleged Propecia side effects on internet forums. The depression study in question was not a placebo-controlled trial, so does not meet the scientific 'gold standard'.Pondle (talk) 14:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

about gynecomastia

I removed the little reference that propecia cause gynecomastia. Feel free to revert my change once you can show a serious reference about that claim. Paldiski 04:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

It is a POSSIBLE side effect...it doesn't ALWAYS cause it. It is one of the listed possible side effects when you purchase the medication. That little form the pharmacy gives you with each medication explaining everything about it, it is listed in there. I am taking that med so I can attest that it is listed in that form. I think it deserves mentioning since it is being advised as being a listed side effect by every pharmacy that distributes it.164.214.1.54 14:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

It is possible, but the clinical trials showed no difference between the incidence of gyno in the treatment and placebo groups.Pondle 10:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Prosmin

Prosmin is another brand under which finasteride is sold

As per: http://www.unitedpharmacies.com/Prosmin_Finasteride ___5mg_30_Tablets_p_188.html

Could someone add this to the article? Thanks ;-)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.179.103.232 (talk) 20:35, 27 July 2007‎ (UTC)

ref?

In the text a reference is made to a paper Rossi 2004, however, in the reerences list, this is not mentioned. What could it be?

80.221.61.231 20:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

That's probably a reference to the Australian Medicines Handbook. I'll check the history and see if I can track it down. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Got it. I couldn't find it because it was ported over from Baldness treatments in August 2006; that article, however, didn't have the reference either, because its content had been copied and pasted from Baldness in May 2005. Thank God for page histories :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:36, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

protection

Could a protection template be added to the article, and the reasoning be stated here on the talk page? 132.205.44.5 (talk) 05:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

OK, I've added the template. This article has been semi-protected to due persistent long-term vandalism. --Ed (Edgar181) 12:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

And not just vandalism: spam and junkpiling. JFW | T@lk 12:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

gynecomastia

Can anyone confirm this observation? Does gynecomastia really last long after discontinuing Finasteride? As far as I remember, everything else I've read indicates side-effects stop after usage is stopped. That's also what the clinical trials reported. --Nectarflowed ^T 08:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Well, gynecomastia is often irreversible. The internet news groups were an attempt at POV by an anon. Feel free to remove it if you can't find the evidence. JFW | T@lk 01:21, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

____________

"The men who took the finasteride lowered their PSA levels by a full 48%. They literally cut their PSA levels in half, but got almost eight times the cancer tumors!" This is from "young again" web site. I have no idea if it's true but it's worth investigating before you that finasteride for any reason.(User_talk:Berryham) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Berryham (talk • contribs) 22:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Prostate cancer

Sfahey, the article now says Finasteride is used to treat prostate cancer, but also increases incidences of aggressive prostate cancer. What was your source for this?--Nectarflowed ^T 23:52, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

I've added this. It is still being worked out, but apparently even though it increases the incidence of the worst type, overall it decreases mortality from prostate cancers. This was demonstrated at the higher dose, the one NOT used for hair loss. Sfahey 01:19, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. The dosage information, though, isn't in the current reference. Do you have another reference? --Nectarflowed ^T 02:06, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

see journal skinMED (3-4/05,pp 67-68), which can be found at <www.lejacq.com> by searching for article #3978

It says in the Propecia drug leaflet, that Prostate Cancer is less likely whilst taking the drug, but of those who do get it it is more likely to be agressive. I don't think the article makes this clear in the opening section, that this is a downside. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.153.10 (talk) 15:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Would need some update, just released study shows clearly a 30 % reduction in all types of cancer (including more agressive ones), it seems the original study found more agressive tumors in the treatment group because of better diagnostic due to smaller prostate gland - its just realeased in the new - looks very promising guys. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.241.7.135 (talk) 01:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, references 2 and 3, cited early in the article, cite the later studies showing no higher incidence of more aggressive prostate cancer, while ref 17, cited later, makes the earlier and opposite claim. Internal contradiction is hard on the innocent reader, and this issue could be very significant to those making an important health choice. Dave94703 (talk) 23:32, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

generic

AUROFINA? There apprears to be a generic vesion of PROPECIA 1mg made by Cipla (India) http://www.mail-rx.com/shop/product.php?productid=16413&cat=251&page=1 This product is sold under the name AUROFINA-1. Code No: MH/DRUGS/KD-19. Does anyone have more information? Should it be added to the generic section?

i believe there is now a generic finasteride, at least for the 5mg. there may or may not also be a generic 1mg (at least in canada?). it woudl be helpful to include this information NorthernLad79

The Proscar (5mg) patent has expired, and there are now legit generic versions available. The only 1mg generics available are Indian versions. Indian patent law allows local drug companies to copy drugs and sell them in the domestic market.Pondle 11:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Does the generic version that you mentioned above - aurofina-1 actually work as it is not available in the UK, and the hair loss clinic i visited have said that it will probably be ineffective, however, they may just be saying this so i am co-erced into purchasing their £400 propecia. i am very unsure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.83.135 (talk) 12:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Proscar and Pregnancy

I am an RN and I am about 9 weeks pregnant. I crushed Proscar, put it into a med cup, added water to disolve it to put it down a peg tube. Before doing so, it settled to the bottom of the med cup and I put my pinky finger into the cup and stirred it so that it would not clog up the peg tube. (Before becoming aware of the risks.) 1 hour after, I began having severe cramping. I am worried. What is the rist of birth defects to my baby, with the med crushed in water? I read it absorbs through the skin. Is my risk greatly decreased since the crushed tablet was disolved in water and my skin is in tact? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.4.47 (talk) 00:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

You should seek professional medical advice.Pondle (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Typo?

There appears to be a typo in Finasteride---Brand Names: Here's the quote: "There is 1 mg of Finasteride in Propecia and 5 mg in Proscar." I believe the '5 mg' should be 0.5 mg, that is 1/2 mg, instead of FIVE mg.

No Proscar is a 5 milligram dose, Propecia 1 milligram Pondle (talk) 22:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Compounded Finasteride

The availability (and abundance) of US-manufactured generic finasteride now allows compounding pharmacists to custom-create finasteride capsules in accordance with physician's prescriptions. Prescriptions may be similar to the Propecia (1mg) dose, higher or lower. While dosages similar to the 1mg are not expected to change the pharmacological properties of the medication (safety, efficacy, side-effects, etc.) it is important because it allows patients access to a Propecia-alternative which is less costly than the name-brand, without splitting pills or risky/illegal importing. It is also possible for the physicain to titrate the dose up or down if it is determined that this may be beneficial for the patient. Anecdotal reports of slight decreases in dosing may decrease side-effects.

This is not considered "Generic Propecia" as Merck's patent is still in effect for at least 4 more years and these capsules are custom-made/compounded on a patient-by-patient basis, not manufactured. Typically, compounded finasteride is approxmately 30% less expensive than name-brand propecia, which is significantly cheaper for patients. Propecia has increased in cost on a regular basis in the 10+ years since FDA-approval. Keep in mind that this medication is not typically covered by insurance, and is typically paid for out-of-pocket by patients.

Preliminary research:

1997 FDA Modernization Act: Compounding Pharmacists are not manufacturing drugs, so are exempt from standard FDA regulation on that basis. [2]

2002 US Supreme Court ruled that the FDA could not restrict pharmacists from advertising or promoting products solely because they were compounded

Sept 2006 -- TX judge rules that compounded drugs are not 'new' and not subject to sanction by FDA. [3]

August 2006 -- FDA warns against purchasing/using prescription drugs from "unreliable Canadian websites" that apparently sell illegal, counterfeit products. FDA found that 87% of meds from "Canadian websites" were actually from 27 other countries [4]

[5] Compounding pharmacy that fills physician's prescriptions for custom-compounded finasteride.

[6] page 45; recent info regarding FDA and compounding.

Obviously, this is an issue which is expected to evolve. Dralanbauman (talk) 18:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Synthetic?

Can it be found in nature? Shouldn't the article specify? Or perhaps it is obvious to the expert?
--Jerome Potts (talk) 23:24, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

It's synthetic. I'll note it in the article, which is incidentally in serious need of some cleanup. An interesting (and not overly technical) article on the chemistry of finasteride is available here, at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy website. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:38, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Hip fracture

Finasteride-like drugs don't seem to increase the risk of osteoporosis despite their anti-androgenic effect. Thankyou. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/300/14/1660 JFW | T@lk 22:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Finasteride linked with male breast cancer!

UK medicines regulator The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) did an indepth analysis and found that Finasteride is linked to an increase in incidents of male breast cancer among users after 53 men using the drug developed the disease. New warnings will now be added to the packaging of Finasteride informing users of this risk.[7]

Could someone please add this to the article - I cant because its in a state of semi-protection. This news is important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.236.249 (talk) 02:19, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

this article needs help

First of all, anyone who's looked on the footnote regarding a "male hormone specialist" can see this does not qualitfy as a reference by WPN standards. It is merely a YOUTUBE video of some guy pushing his own hair-growth formula. Doesn't make thsi drug a health risk. The only correlation is depression and hair loss, that is men with thinning hair tend to be miserable, or at least post this on the "internet groups" referenced in this article. Impotence in about 1% (stats via a controlled study). Certainly not causative regarding PROSCAR, which, incidentally, has been proven to re-grow hair on a man's head (a good thing!), increase testosterone (another good thing!) and reduce risk of prostate cancer (ditto!).

Somebody clean this article up!

Jessicabest9 (talk) 23:31, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Ingestion of semen

"It appears that Finasteride can pass into the semen of men, thus, at certain dosages, caution should be used to avoid ingestion of semen during oral sex if a woman is pregnant or may become pregnant." Well, is this true? So does this actually mean that it can be harmful at conception if used by the male? --James Bond 02:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

According to Merck: "Yes, you can take PROPECIA if you and your wife are trying to conceive or if your wife is currently pregnant. Contact with the semen from a man being treated with PROPECIA is not a risk to the unborn child of a pregnant woman." http://www.propecia.com/finasteride/propecia/consumer/facts/faq.jsp

Available data indicate that the level of PROPECIA in the semen of a man taking PROPECIA does not pose a risk to an unborn child. Accordingly, a man can take PROPECIA while conceiving a child with his partner, or have sexual intercourse with his partner if she is already pregnant. http://www.propecia.com/finasteride/propecia/consumer/about-propecia/faqs.jsp —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themightythor1212 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

(Please sign your talk page entries. I didn't write the paragraph above.) This doesn't actually answer the technical question of "does finasteride pass into semen", but from a fetal-safety point of view, it doesn't seem to be an issue, so I'm going to rephrase that statement in the main page. -- JdwNYC 15:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Antiandrogen

Reference 11 on this page states "Finasteride has no affinity for the androgen receptor and does not act as an anti-androgen, nor does it have androgenic, estrogenic, antiestrogenic, progestational, or other steroidal properties." Clearly this wikipedia entry is in error. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flying Hamster (talk • contribs) 10:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

No this statement is made by the manufacturer. Finasteride is a specific 5AR inhibitor rather than a general anti-androgen.Pondle (talk) 11:49, 12 April 2008 (UTC) I am now injecting 250mg of testoviron depot once a week and injesting 50mg dhea daily to try to raise my testoterone level. I am 65 and in general very good health. I have been taking Tamsulsin Hydrochlorde 0.4mg daily for my enlarged prostrate. If I take finasteride 1mg daily for my thinning hair, will it cause any problems in a reaction with my testosterone treatments?Yours, Spacydick —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spacydick (talk • contribs) 09:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

wiil nottaking finasteride bring my semen quantity to normal? how long after?

miguel angel ngel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.244.204.1 (talk) 07:07, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Finasteride for Tourette's Syndrome

Apparently some researchers in Italy have reported excellent results in treating certain instances of Tourette's syndrome [8].

'A 34-year-old man with a 25-year history of severe Tourette’s syndrome was referred to our service following a precipitation of his clinical conditions. His symptoms included self-injuring motor tics (i.e., glass smashing and knuckle rubbing against rough surfaces), explosive bouts of complex vocalizations, stereotyped coprolalic utterances, ritual behaviors, aggressive and contamination-theme obsessions, cleaning and checking compulsions, and excessive sexual drive. Magnetic resonance imaging and laboratory tests were normal. His current treatment—initiated 2 years before and included pimozide (4 mg/day), clomipramine (37.5 mg/day), chlorpromazine (25 mg/day), and lorazepam (7.5 mg/day)—had only resulted in a transient, slight decrease of motoric compulsions and anxiety. After obtaining informed consent, we added finasteride (5 mg/day) to his current treatment and periodically assessed his symptoms by means of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale and Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale.

Finasteride gradually reduced both motor and phonic tics. Because of a misunderstanding about the regimen duration, the patient discontinued treatment at week 18. Three days later, he called our service complaining of a dramatic exacerbation in Tourette’s syndrome symptoms. Notably, the prompt reinstatement of finasteride led to a clear clinical improvement. After 28 weeks of treatment, finasteride led to a dramatic reduction in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (Figure 1) and Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale scores (obsessive score: 58.3% initial values; compulsive score: 38.4% initial values). The patient also reported a normalized sex drive, enhanced mood and life quality, and no untoward effects.'

Interesting. Anyone care to work a reference into the article? The page appears to be protected. Although, you have to acknowledge that the regimen of drugs that the patient was on is pretty heavy-duty, including Ativan (lorazepam), Thorazine (chlorpromazine), and other psychotropic/neuroleptic medication. 71.17.52.50 (talk) 06:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm sure the the poor bastard is dead by now: reason one. no real meds were given such as neuro-protecting cannabinoids. reason two. if the chlorpromazine didnt get him, the Finasteride surely would have. The FDA IS the conspiracy and are no less than drugcompany-paid assassins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.158.0.26 (talk) 07:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah right, "neuro-protecting cannabinoids" are (possibly the only) real meds and FDA is the conspiracy. --Wayfarer (talk) 19:25, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

reference disapeared

Ref number 17 should be changed with this one http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dailys/00/jun00/060700/cp00001.rtf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.187.51.130 (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Is a satisfactory article on this subject likely?

As an enthusiastic booster of Wikipedia for almost any kind of inquiry, I hate to see her verge into areas where her model is not particularly applicable. Detailed pharmacology, even detailed examination of adverse effects, is one such area. Evaluating drug safety, effectiveness, interactions, dosage, adverse effects and so forth can only be achieved (at least at the present time) by long-term prospective studies along with rigorously conducted statistical analysis. Even for the best of such studies, interpretations still vary.

This article is now part rehash of published data, part anecdotal material not much above the discussion forum level. I don't see how Wikipedia can realistically do much better in this particularly difficult and unusual realm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dratman (talk • contribs) 17:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Updated Patient Information Leaflet (PIL) - Reference 12 now has broken link

The Patient Information Leaflet (PIL) for Propecia has been updated on 2010-03-18. When the new PIL was published by the Swedish MPA the address to it was changed, so the document can no longer be found using the current link in Reference 12. Hence the link should be updated to point to the new PIL.

The new address is: Patient Information Leaflet in English (http://www.lakemedelsverket.se/SPC_PIL/Pdf/enhumpil/Propecia%20film-coated%20tablet%20ENG.doc)

Can someone please update the reference with the new link address? (This Wiki page is semi-protected so I cannot do it myself) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.230.5.41 (talk) 11:45, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

What kind of birth defects occur?

The article does not go into much detail concerning the birth defects that may result from a woman's contact with finasteride while she is with child. The article, however, does not go into a lot of detail on which defects occur. Are the birth defects typically intersex conditions such as non-virilization, or some other type of defect?

Please let me know at your earliest convenience. Pine (talk) 18:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

The Proscar product information simply states that if a pregnant woman comes into contact with the drug, "it may affect the normal development of the baby’s sex organs". Pondle (talk) 11:44, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Please read the following abstract: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jm00161a028 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yid (talk • contribs) 17:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Investigation by the Swedish Medical Products Agency

This investigation concluded in late 2008. The Agency has issued new guidance on Propecia, including advice that some users may experience persistent difficulty achieving an errection, even after discontinuing use of Propecia.

A copy of the new advice can be found on the Agency's website, here: http://www.lakemedelsverket.se/upload/SPC_PIL/Pdf/enhumpil/Propecia%20film-coated%20tablet%20ENG.pdf

Currently the finasteride article states that this investigation is still underway. Can someone with the power to do so please update the article?

GoodThought101 (talk) 16:18, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

The wording should be changed to highlight "PERMENANT ERECTICAL DYSFUNCTION" can be caused by Finasteride. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.129.211.97 (talk) 19:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

The Swedish FDA lists this side effect as 'incidence unknown' and 'based on spontaneous reports.' That should be mentioned. The huge 7 year FCPT and 2 year follow up should count just as much as 'spontaneous reports' with 'unknown incidence'. The take on that 19,000 subject study was: "Now, with ***several studies allaying concerns about the drug’s possible drawbacks, including concerns about sexual dysfunction,*** Thompson believes men should be told routinely about the potential benefits of finasteride when they come to the doctor’s office for a PSA test, in much the same way patients at risk of heart disease are told about the benefits of statin drugs." If anyone can demonstrate actual double blind peer-reviewed research demonstrating persistent (how can we call them permanent) sexual side effects, instead of a governmental agency responding to emails, I'll quickly admit that I was wrong.67.84.209.60 (talk) 21:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

According to private correspondence, there is one case of documented permanent erectile dysfunction: "Hello,

To answer the question, there is one spontaneously reported case describing erectile dysfunction, in the Swedish database. Concerning data regarding cases in clinical trials (exposed patients compared to controls) please contact the company.

Best regards; Cecilia Bergengren MD, Clinical assessor Unit for Efficacy and Safety 1 Medical Products Agency Uppsala"

In response to my question: (paraphrased) how many people in "post-marketing" spontaneously claimed this side effect: persistence of erectile dysfunction after discontinuation of treatment with PROPECIA. Steelblade (talk) 15:53, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Side Effects Listed Do Not Match The Reference

The reference is drugs.com.

The Side Effects Listed in the source are:

TABLE 2. Drug-Related Adverse Experiences for PROSCAR (finasteride 5 mg) BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA N = 1524 and 1516, finasteride vs placebo, respectively

.

YEAR 1 Impotence- 8.1 vs 3.7 Decreased Libido 6.4 vs 3.4

YEARS- 2, 3, 4: Impotence 5.1 vs 5.1 Decreased Libido 2.6 vs 2.6

http://www.drugs.com/sfx/propecia-side-effects.html#ixzz0vhaRJxr4

The article makes no mention of the fact that there is no significant difference in ED and Decreased Libido after the first year of treatment. It also, inexplicably, puts the incidence of ED at > 18%!67.84.209.60 (talk) 04:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

You can be bold and add the reference and data yourself... — raekyT 04:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

I can't edit this page, and I don't feel like making an account on the assumption that is the problem.67.84.209.60 (talk) 09:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

To edit this page you do have to have an account... — raekyT 22:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 128.36.205.2, 20 October 2010

{{edit semi-protected}} The link to source #13, the Swedish leaflet, doesn't work. The correct link should be: http://www.lakemedelsverket.se/SPC_PIL/Pdf/humpil/Propecia%201%20mg%20tablet.pdf 128.36.205.2 (talk) 16:00, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Done. Thanks. -Atmoz (talk) 21:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

New Study - October 2010

A new study published in the "Archives of Dermatology" concludes that 1 in 80 finasteride users experience erectile dysfunction. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69J3IW20101020 - Could someone please add this new info to the article. 86.163.201.239 (talk) 01:43, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Environmental persistence?

From the description, it appears that this could be considered an endocrine disruptor in women. Once it leaves the patient's body, is it substantially destroyed in the waste water treatment process before release into the environment? If not, is it persistent in the environment such that it could be ingested unintentionally in drinking water? This pattern is believed to occur with certain other endocrine disruptors and is a matter of environmental concern. I don't currently have access to a university library so I can't search the journals for an answer to these questions, but if this topic has been researched it may be notable for the article. 96.228.129.74 (talk) 07:38, 10 November 2010 (UTC)