Jump to content

Talk:Filip Đuričić

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 25 January 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: NOT MOVED. SLBedit (talk) 16:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Filip ĐuričićFilip Djuricic – His name is written as "Filip Djuricic", and sometimes as "Filip Djuričić", in the English-speaking world. The evidence is the references and external links in his article. Even his shirt name displays "F. Djuricic". SLBedit (talk) 18:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. JMHamo (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe. Considering Lazar Marković and Nemanja Matić, "Djuričić" is probably the best choice. Well, that's because it's a Serbian website. SLBedit (talk) 19:17, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Guardian 2014 "And finally, Newcastle United will spend £7m on Benfica midfielder Filip Đuričić, much to the chagrin of the staff member tasked to operate the big steamy shirt contraption in the club shop, not least because Newcastle might make a big-money bid for the head of diacritics at Arsenal, who is well schooled now after last year's Mesut Özil affair.

User:SLBedit this player hasn't taken Belgian nationality has he? Maybe you're not familiar with en.wp naming practices - yes it occasionally happens that a few Serbians, or their employers, spell their names outside Serbia with the old pre-WWI Đ which was Dj, but we consistently on en.wp use post WWI spelling. Do you want to withdraw this proposal? See Đuričić. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:38, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How do I do that? SLBedit (talk) 02:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SLBedit, typically a nominator can withdraw if there are no other editors supporting the proposition, which appears to be the case here. If you'd like to withdraw, you can close the discussion yourself, or if you just say you'd like to withdraw, someone else can make a procedural close. Ping me if you need help with this. --BDD (talk) 15:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@GiantSnowman: What is IIO? SLBedit (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
'In ictu oculi'??? GiantSnowman 18:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That would be Iio. SLBedit (talk) 18:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.