Talk:Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building

Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 6, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Federal Reserve Bank of New York was copied or moved into Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building (pictured) has been described as "a bigger Florentine palace than has ever stood in Florence"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building.

Wikipedia

Untitled

Here's an article with more information on the vault: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Story?id=5835433 220.233.191.2 (talk) 00:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lede image dispute

There's a dispute between two editors regarding which is the better lede image for the article. The two images are:

Image 1

Image 2

Other potential lede images can be found here.

Opinions? BMK (talk) 03:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Undoubtedly this is an incredibly difficult building to photograph from the narrow streets of NY City. Even Image 1 does not show the complete building (the top is missing). In addition, its a pity that "Chase" is a bit spoiling the image imho. Image 2 does not show the complete building. Searching in google images, I found this old postcard, which is showing the complete building, with the fortress like appearance (as described in the text) and some small old-fashioned cars: http://www.usgwarchives.net/ny/newyork/postcards/frbank.jpg

I do not know if the 2 of you live in NY, and how this image is made - perhaps with a View camera from an opposite building - and perhaps coloured by hand, but perhaps you could make a similar picture... Ellywa (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That image would be very difficult to recreate without access to one of the nearby buildings to shoot out of, at least for me; perhaps other photographers might be able to do it. I found another shot from a similar angle in the New York Public Library Digital Collection, but unfortunately neither that shot nor the postcard you linked to have any available information on their date of publication, so they can't be uploaded to Commons. Using an existing shot may still be a good idea, though, if I can find one which has fallen into the public domain. BMK (talk) 22:46, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conditions being what they are for this building it is unlikely, like suggested by others, that a perfect photo will be found. I would vote for the Image 1 from the proposed images. Pistongrinder (talk) 18:04, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Given the choice between the two images as presented, I would vote for Image 1 as well, as it seems to present a more complete picture of the building entire. DonIago (talk) 12:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC) See below. DonIago (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both are fine, but I might lean toward imagine 1, too. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:08, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer image 2—although it has the disadvantage of not showing the entire building (or anything close to it), it is otherwise a better image: image 1 is distorted, shadowy, and has the somewhat distracting blue thing with the Chase logo. —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am going with Image 2 - I agree about the unattractive shadow effect on the building and the distracting Chase logo. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I went out today to see if I could answer the various requests and ideas which have been presented here. It's really a tough building to get a good shot of, especially if, like me, you're not working with professional equipment. However, here are two other possibilities for a lede image, which I'll call #3 and #4:

Image 3 (from the west, full front facade)

Image 4 (from the east, the "point" of the trapezoidal building)

Any thoughts or feedback? BMK (talk) 00:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking these, BMK! Of the four that are now on this page, I think Image 3 is the best—it includes the entire building without the disadvantages of Image 1. —Granger (talk · contribs) 00:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Image 3 also looks good to me. Image 4 is too "empty" with no neighboring buildings. Epic Genius (talk) 02:18, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If the apparently top of the building in Image 4 is the actual top of the building, then I prefer that one. Otherwise, I would have to say it's a little misleading and prefer Image 3. Either one is preferable to the original options. DonIago (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is the actual top of that end of the building, as the image at right shows. IIRC, everything above the original cornice line was added later. BMK (talk) 21:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Look like I misremembered. There was an eastern extension to the building (which would have included the castle-like top on that end), but I can find no mention in the sources of additional floors being added. BMK (talk) 21:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image 4 might still be a bit misleading, since the top of the majority of the buildng is as seen in Images 1 & 3 (and a little in #2). BMK (talk) 21:24, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to be bold at this point and put Image 3 into the lede. Image 4, I think, doesn't really give a good feeling for the building's bulk. BMK (talk) 21:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Annuit Cceptis

Is this plaque located on the Federal Reserve Bank Building? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 13:15, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building

... that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building (pictured) has been described as "a bigger Florentine palace than has ever stood in Florence"? Source: Brooks, John (1969). Business Adventures: Twelve Classic Tales from the World of Wall Street (2014 ed.). New York: Open Road Integrated Media. p. 358.
- ALT1:... that a name sign was installed on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building (pictured) after bondholders got lost while looking for it? Source: "Bank Breaks Tradition By Hanging Up Name". The New York Times. April 7, 1944. p. 11
- ALT2:... that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building stores 6,190 short tons (5,620 metric tons) of gold, none of which is owned by the Federal Reserve? Source: "Gold Vault". Federal Reserve Bank of New York
- ALT3:... that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building holds 6,190 short tons (5,620 metric tons) of gold, making it the world's largest known monetary-gold reserve? Source: "Gold Vault". Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jarnail Singh (doctor)

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 19:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Another fascinating article on NYC. I loved the $1.75 charges to move a bar of gold. The photograph adequately depicts the hook, which is rare. Just the QPQ. No Swan So Fine (talk) 09:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC) No Swan So Fine (talk) 09:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@No Swan So Fine: Thanks for yet another review. I've done a QPQ now. I did consider writing a hook about the $1.75 movement charge per bar, and there were plenty of other strange facts in there that I also considered writing about. Epicgenius (talk) 16:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BORSA ITALIANA

BANKITALIA 151.77.36.60 (talk) 20:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

33 Maiden Lane ownership

Hello User:Epicgenius. Could it be the purchase of the property by the Fed got lost somehow in your otherwise commendable series of edits? Or do you have a reason for not mentioning the sale? CapnZapp (talk) 10:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CapnZapp, it's still in the article, but mentioned in the 21st century section. Epicgenius (talk) 12:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think its a good idea to make the 33 Maiden Lane section self-contained. As I see it, a current reader would easily -too easily- be left with the impression Park Tower Realty remains its current owner. CapnZapp (talk) 12:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I've moved that sentence up. – Epicgenius (talk) 13:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whitney Museum

I don't think the branch of the museum was held by the POPS, User: Epicgenius. I think the POPS was used to access the museum branch, which was otherwise housed inside the building itself. Please check the sources to verify if your take is correct; thanks. CapnZapp (talk) 11:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out. I actually meant to write "From 1988 to 1992, the building...", which is what Stern actually says. Epicgenius (talk) 12:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]