Talk:Fagul Rusului River

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 May 2011. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Help Romania reach at least GA-status
- Help History of Romania get WP:GOOD
- Request an article or create a missing one
Assess :
- Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality
Cleanup :
- Review the Romania-related cleanup listing
- Normalize the use of "Northern Bukovina" (capitalized) and "Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast) all over Wikipedia
Disambiguation :
- Disambiguate project articles and get points
Expand :
- Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania
Translate :
- Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Wikipedia
- Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian)
Unreferenced : * Add more reference to FC CFR Timișoara.
Other :
- Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 (WLM Romania external site)
- Review newly created Romania-related articles
- Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items
- Create Awards for WikiProject Romania
- Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

Rivers

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles

Any comments?

There are a large number of minor tributaries with stand-alone articles that are eternal stubs, such as this one, Elișeva River, Radu River (Mraconia), and Bentu River. There are more at Category:Rivers of the subbasins of small tributaries of the Danube. However, existence does not prove notability. Should they be deleted, merged into the article for the main river/basin, or kept as stubs? Looking for some other opinions here as this would be a very big move. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree - I took a look at what you were referring to and I agree with the move. It would take some time, but after carefully reviewing the pages and the WP:N policy it seems this case would warrant an article merger. It should be un-merged again only if there was detailed, notable information to be included about each tributary. I say go for it. Demokratickid (talk) 00:20, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agree - in what concerns tributaries of tributaries of major rivers, which are definitely permastubs. Dahn (talk) 10:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree Stubs are simply short articles, short articles were common and useful in the encyclopedias with which I grew up. WP:Five pillars identifies that Wikipedia is partly a gazeteer. Existence might not prove notability, but I think that a detailed government map, with one fact to add to the gazeteer, does. I did a Google search on Bentu River, and there were maybe 3 pages of Wiki mirrors and absolutely no additional references. I also tried Google maps. But looking at the article, there are two sources listed, and two sources is enough to satisfy WP:V content criteria. And I find the information in the infobox to be compelling that the material is reliable and more than just a place on a map. 10km (6 mi) long is what I would call a creek. As long as it is reliably sourced, is there something wrong with listing a creek in Wikipedia? Unscintillating (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]