Talk:Fabio Mancini

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 May 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Fabmac2024 (talk · contribs)
Sandrajean11 (talk · contribs)

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Authority control

I need VIAF, Worldcat and Italy added to this page Fabmac2024 (talk) 14:30, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea how Template:Authority control works or who to ask about that, but maybe someone else does. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The models.com mentions

Is it something this article should bother to include? I don't know if it's WP:SPS, WP:USERG or something else. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:50, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ifaict by [1], it appears to be a kind of linkedin for models. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Found a recent discussion on it at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_432#Models.com_rankings. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång: What makes a source reliable is things like factchecking, peer review, editorial standards, transparancy, independence and acountability. Models.com got none of that as far as we know. (note that I changed the section header) Polygnotus (talk) 13:26, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]