Jump to content

Talk:Explorers on the Moon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Explorers on the Moon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 11:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I will review this article. Thank you.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

Lede
Synopsis
  • "disrupting the artificial gravity and sending everyone floating" — Wikilinks for "artificial gravity" and "floating" could be better for those readers who are not wholly aware of the two terms. For clarity's sake.
Found the link for 'floating' myself.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 03:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, chasm is a synonym of fissure, which sounded more scientific and some readers might not understand it well.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 03:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
History

Thats about it from me. Once again, great job, Midnightblueowl. Do ping me when you have resolved the comments.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's great Ssven2; many thanks! Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
    Pass or Fail:

@Midnightblueowl: Thank you for resolving them, Midnightblueowl. Congratulations!  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 03:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bob de Moor[edit]

How come we have a GA on this book which doesn't even mention Bob de Moor? Seems like a serious oversight. Destination Moon (comics), also a GA, does mention him (the fact that he got hired), but again nothing further. According to Pierre Assouline, De Moor already played a "pivotal role" in Destination Moon (backgorunds, and the rocket!)[1], and we all know how much the Moon landscapes by De Moor were essential in the look of the "Explorers" story. The De Moor biography has more information[2]. Fram (talk) 08:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]