This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
The examples that are currently given under the "See also" section are way too general and broad.
The examples on the related category page [1] are not fully representative of exploratory engineering (EE). They are all high level predictions which draw from many EE results and other assumptions.
Exploratory engineering can be much more focused and fundamental and with that more reliable.
I think a good example would be e.g. the paper "A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis"[1]
The prototypical form of EE is the work done in "Nanosystems" [2][3].
A work for which the term exploratory engineering as far as I understand was invented.
The contents of this work are much more fundamental than the current examples on wikipedia.
(error rates, friction levels, power densities, ...)
Login Mechadense (talk) 15:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
