Talk:Exeter–Plymouth line

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Exeter–Plymouth line article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Trains: in UK Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	March 26, 2022

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Devon High‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiltshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Exeter to Plymouth Line diagram.

Lines Covered

This article is headed 'Exeter to Plymouth Line' but contains much detail on other lines (e.g. signalling info of lines around Reading). This info may be from an earlier version of the article. Should this article be pruned to only include info covered by the scope of the title? Some of the extra info can be moved into other articles or perhaps be in a subsection covering the wider infrastructure / services. These would be my preferences, any other opinions before I make any changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2ghoti (talk • contribs) 17:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Redhill to Tonbridge Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 February 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved to Exeter–Plymouth line. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 19:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exeter to Plymouth Line → Exeter to Plymouth line – Downcase per WP:NCCAPS; sources mostly do not cap it. Optionally, say if you prefer to use the symmetric dashed version (Exeter–Plymouth line) rather than "to" between place names, as in many other descriptive line names. Dicklyon (talk) 03:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence in sources

news
books

Please examine the searches, see if there is a common name, whether the dashed version is preferred, and whether caps are preferred. It is my impression that there is no proper name here and that "Exeter and Plymouth line" (symmetric, like the dash would be) is more common. Dicklyon (talk) 03:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support—first pref. "Exeter–Plymouth line", because it's easier for our readers to pick up visually and accords with current conventions in English. Second pref. as nominated. Tony (talk) 04:02, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS (source usage is mixed, so default to lower-case; general-audience sources prefer lower-case anyway). Prefer Exeter–Plymouth line per WP:CONCISE. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 18:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Opening date and history

Why 1906? The line from Exeter to Plymouth was entirely open by 1849. The date when there was a more direct route to London does not seem relevant. Mdrb55 (talk) 22:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]