Talk:Eurostat

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales

is it worth mentioning that Eurostat issued a map of Europe but forgot to draw in Wales as Trivia. Source can be found on BBC news page with a headline like "Wales vanishes off map of europe" I think. I'm asking because I'm not sure it's relevent. TJ 09.05.07 1640 GMT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.41.203.193 (talk) 15:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Eurostat scandal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was merge. -- Boson (talk) 20:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest merging Eurostat scandal into this article.--Boson 19:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. There is no Eurostat scandal. There are only allegations that were never proofed. Wikipedia should stick to facts, not wild rumours. -- B. Feldmann —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.99.63.81 (talk) 17:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Whether or not there is a scandal is a different issue, but it seems that there are some sources which show that the scandal was at least a big deal in the news. OptimistBen 08:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The fraud lasted over 15 years . Eurostat became as OLAF, the EU antifraud body, wrote : "A vast enterprise for looting community fund" . Wild rumors, Feldmann ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djwinch (talk • contribs) 11:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Review of the article

The content appears outdated. I started to modify it fundamentally. Further links need to be added.

The text on the Eurostat scandal was moved to an own article without changes in content. A reference in the history part of the Eurostat article points to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FHGS (talk • contribs) 20:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Directorate General?

I'm going off Nugent's (2010) standard textbook here, which states that Eurostat is not a DG, but a specialised service (page 117). Has this situation changed since Nugent's book? Bandanamerchant (talk) 14:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]