Talk:European Union competition law

Summaries of this article appear in Competition law and European Union law.

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Union High‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Top‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of European Community regulation was copied or moved into European Union competition law with this edit on 18:52, 20 February 2012. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Proposed merge with Enforcement in the EU

As it stands Enforcement in the EU is a WP:POVFORK of, and needs to go into, European_Union_competition_law#European_enforcement, or to needs to be developed as a true Content fork. Either outcome is appropriate. Fiddle Faddle 19:54, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This proposal has been overtaken by events and is no linger required. Struck and retained for history. Fiddle Faddle 08:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section improvement

Dear editors, I've made some changes to the lead section which (I think) brings it more in line with article contents. Please let me know if you agree with the changes, so that I can remove the maintenance tag. Maximilian Aigner (talk) 09:47, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The person who added the tag didn't give any reason, so I've no way to verify that their problem still exists. The lead doesn't look flagrantly nonsensical to me so I'm removing the tag. If someone wants to re-add the tag, be my guest, but please jot down some hints about what needs to be fixed. Great floors (talk) 20:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Potential effects" citation

A citation is requested in the second paragraph of the History section regarding the "potential effects" of a trade agreement on trade within the single market between Member States. The citation is "Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v Commission of the European Economic Community (ECLI:EU:C:1966:41 at page 341)." Url is https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:61964CJ0056&from=EN