Jump to content

Talk:European Anti-Fraud Office

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Erik,

I have no objections. But it is also good practice to call the readers' attention to a potential violation of the Wikipedia standards of Neutrality. You have to agree that it is obvious that undue weight is given to one specific topic: There is no paragraph longer than the one on Mr Tillack...

My suggestion: Explain the entire thing in all detail under the entry Hans-Martin Tillack and keep only a short summary here. After all, it is only this case how Hans-Martin Tillack has become world famous (and therefore worthy of his own Wikipedia entry).

James

---

James Blunt, I think it is inappropriate that a contrubutor calls for revision before any discussion has taken place. Particularily if the contributor is anonymous, as you are. That is why I have moved your complaint to this discussion page.

Best regards,

Erik Josefsson


REVISION NECESSARY

After recent changes parts of this article do not fulfill the Wikipedia standards of Neutrality (Neutral point of view) any more. A user added more and more elements under section Cases in order to give undue weight to one single topic - the one of Hans-Martin Tillack. Furthermore, the user favoured his point of view in a partial manner and, on the other hand, deleted elements favourable to OLAF. It seems very strongly that that the interested person himself has changed the entry. --James Blunt 14:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Is it not unethical for OLAF members, or other Commission staff for that matter, to hide behind internet aliases if and when they try to promote their office or institution?

Olaf was set up in 1989 and not in 1999, as stated in your article under "History" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.56.139.234 (talk) 23:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on European Anti-fraud Office. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on European Anti-Fraud Office. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]