A fact from Eugen Relgis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 March 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war
This article is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Symbolism and Art Nouveau, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Symbolism and Art Nouveau on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Symbolism and Art NouveauWikipedia:WikiProject Symbolism and Art NouveauTemplate:WikiProject Symbolism and Art NouveauSymbolism and Art Nouveau
This article is part of WikiProject Uruguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to expatriates in Uruguay. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.UruguayWikipedia:WikiProject UruguayTemplate:WikiProject UruguayUruguay
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
This article has far to many categories and projects. wp:overcategorization I removed a few what seem to be obviously peripheral projects, and a bunch of what look like less central categories, but there are still far to many projects and categories. Should only list those categories that are most appropriate, most characterisitic - the most apropos 4 or 5 (but even whittling it down to the most apropos dozen would be a good start.)
There are also too many projects listed - again was this person particularly noted for being a librarian (e.g.) (is their major contribution to the world in the field of librarianship, or whatever), if not then consider removing said project. Zodon (talk) 05:13, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, you mean we should introduce a WP:POV on which aspects of his activity are most important. Btw, where exactly is this "don't add too many projects" policy? As for the categories, I fail too see which categories overlap in this instance. Do we have him under a "Sociologists active in 1930", "Sociologists active in 1932" etc. system? Dahn (talk) 11:24, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please see overcategorization above. The point is not to tag every little thing, but to get the cental, defining categories for this page. What points are defining for this individual and their notability.
If Barack Obama can manage with a mere 37 categories, this page certainly doesn't need 72. If you have questions about the guidelines, then the talk page on the guidelines is a good place for them.
Did not say they overlap - just that they are excessive. Is this person really noted for being each one of these things. (i.e. not just were they one, but did they make a major contribution to that group). Zodon (talk) 19:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If they don't overlap, how do you distinguish between the "important" and "unimportant" ones without imposing a POV? What's more, the guideline you refer to is quite clearly about categories which do overlap, so I don't really need to go discuss it there - it simply doesn't apply here. And I don't see the point of the Obama analogy: Obama is very noted for being a few things, Relgis is moderately noted for being many things. Dahn (talk) 20:05, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To put it briefly, having too many categories detracts from the article. It overwhelms the reader, and essentially all categories become useless. It also suggests attempting to overcompensate for somebody who didn't do anything of note. (i.e. they didn't do anything that stood out, so they were just mediocre at a lot of things, whatever they actually did is buried fluff). Somebody like Leonardo da Vinci is noted for being excellent at many things (a Renaisance man) but the article still manages with 30 some categories.
"Limit the number: Try to limit the number of categories. For example, a film actor who holds a law degree should be categorized as a film actor, but not as a lawyer unless his or her legal career was notable in its own right. However it is also important to ensure that categories contain all of the most relevant articles. This means that some prominent people, such as senior politicians who have held many different offices, will be in a considerable number of categories. Apart from these factual categories, for those categories that require an assessment of personal characteristics (e.g. art movement style...), try to limit the number of categories to what is most essential about this person, something in the vein of: "give me 4 or 5 words that best characterize this person." Zodon (talk) 06:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Let me explain again: Relgis is not an actor with a law degree; he is a person who, based on what sources say (not on what I interpret to be "most important" about him) has had a contribution in many fields, and yes, they all are reasons why we have this article. Instead of lecturing me about how some categories don't belong here potentially, what say you actually read the text and then make suggestions that are based on realities, not on abstract analogies? Dahn (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Asside - no idea what happened on my recent edit. All I told it to do was to add the tag {{too many categories}}. Wikipedia or my browser must have glitched in a major way to have cut out a big chunk of the article. Zodon (talk) 07:58, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
