Talk:Esther Salas

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

United States courts and judges Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

United States: Hispanic and Latino / Mexican-Americans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Hispanic and Latino Americans portal This article is supported by the Hispanic and Latino Americans task force.
	This article is supported by the Mexican-American task force.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2020 Shooting Information

In the personal life section of the article I added information about the shooting of Mark and Daniel Anderl. It's a bit rough at the moment and may need some bold polishing. Thank you. Praefect94 (talk) 01:25, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the header level so that this subsection is actually within the Personal Life section. It is conceivable that as more becomes known about the perpetrator(s) and their motive, a different arrangement may be justified. Neutron (talk) 14:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I read somewhere else that the husband answered the door and the son came running and got shot next. Maybe someone can confirm who answered the door first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8109:1A3F:C906:9C0A:7DE5:5564:71D4 (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC) — 2A02:8109:1A3F:C906:9C0A:7DE5:5564:71D4 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

I just read the articles on CNN, NBC, NY Times and ABC. Two say the husband was shot first, two say the son was shot first. So there are "reliable sources" for each, and half of them are wrong. I think we leave it however it is now and see what is announced over the next day or so. Neutron (talk) 16:54, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suspect Found Dead

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

It says within the article that the attacker is at large but the suspect has been found dead https://abcnews.go.com/US/federal-judges-son-shot-killed-husband-injured-attack/story?id=71871708 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.168.224 (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC) — 92.8.168.224 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Your request is moot, as future edits have now included the death of the assumed perpetrator. I was not the person who made the edit. GreenFrogsGoRibbit (talk) 21:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not an MRA

Roy Den Hollander explicitely renounced any connection to or involvement with the men's rights movement. The following quote can be found in his manifesto here.

I don’t belong to that group of wimps and whiners. They’re trying to win back their rights by acting like girls instead of men.
Most men’s rights advocates act like little girls and behave largely as the Feminists tell them to. You can identify them by the politically correct lingo they use and their copying of Feminists tactics by simply changing the sex. For example, “A woman is more likely to physically attack a guy than vice versa.” True, but who cares, unless she’s behind the wheel of a Mercedes Benz. Even if she has a gun, most girls can’t shoot straight anyway, so unless it’s a shotgun, she’ll miss.
In one of my martial arts class, one Senshi always told us don’t hit the girls and I don’t. I let them hit me, which rarely hurts, unless it’s low.
What the men’s righters don’t understand is that girls have different weapons for causing evil, such as fraud and the intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Robert Brockway (talk) 12:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Still sounds like one to me. Muttnick (talk) 15:04, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

just four days before the shooting

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add: Salas’ recent assignment to the Epstein case, occurred just four days before the tragic shooting.

Reference: https://www.newsweek.com/judge-esther-salas-shooting-deutsche-bank-epstein-1518974

--87.170.199.219 (talk) 17:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:04, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After → "Salas is the judge presiding over the class-action lawsuit against Deutsche Bank (Karimi v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft et al.), which alleges that Deutsche Bank had poor financial reporting practices and made misleading statements to securities investors, resulting from Deutsche Bank's desire to obscure its anti-money laundering deficiencies and its poor monitoring of high-risk customers such as Jeffrey Epstein, Danske Bank in Estonia, and FBME Bank.[18][19]"

Please add: "The New York State Department of Financial Services had settled with Deutsche Bank over the bank’s “significant compliance failures”, resulting in Deutsche Bank paying a $150 million fine. The case was assigned to Salas on July 15, 2020.

References:

--217.234.78.51 (talk) 05:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update needed

Congress Passes the Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act

Published onDecember 16, 2022

https://www.uscourts.gov/news/2022/12/16/congress-passes-daniel-anderl-judicial-security-and-privacy-act Jdalejcik (talk) 21:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]