Talk:Ercilla, Chile

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ercilla, Chile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

result:
Not moved. See consensus below to keep things as they are at present. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy, Healthy Publishing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 05:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links: current log • target log

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

Ercilla, Chile → Ercilla
Ercilla → Ercilla (disambiguation)

– Primary meaning, a breif look into what quality internet content show as Ercilla makes it clear it is the commune and town and not the writer, also in everyday speech in Chile Ercilla is a place not a writer. It is worth noting that Spanish Wikipedia have also the town and commune as the primary meaning for Ercilla. Dentren | ^Talk 08:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC) —Relisted. P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 16:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Ercilla titles a dab page with significant content and so is ineligible as a "new" page title unless it is also renamed. This request has been altered to reflect that fact. P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 16:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move the DAB to the base name per views the place gets 29 views but the magazine gets 15 and the plant gets 14, the writer has 206[[1]] but he's a PTM for the single word. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Support DAB at base name, no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment: Setting Ercilla as a disambiguation page will sent 100% of viewers to the wrong page (the disambiguation page). Instead having Ercilla being the town will at least give many the right page. How many we dont know, because we can not know what page people are expecting to see when they type or click at Ercilla, but there a case that people searching for the poet will do so by his name, while for those seeking the town and commune it will be less obvious to type ", Chile" to obtain the right result. Dentren | ^Talk 07:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - Firstly per WP:NOPRIMARY a DAB page should be at the base name even if there are just 2 options (though per WP:2DABPRIMARY we can have a lower threshold) secondly there are 5 entries on the DAB, even leaving the poet and asteroid aside the magazine and plant get as many views as the place anyway so having the place at the base name would inconvenience more people than it would help however I would support that over the stats quo but as far as I can see there's no primary topic so that's the best option. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Buidhe: You moved the DAB to the basename this morning but didn't close this request. Its now been modified to a multi-move by Paine Ellsworth due to the DAB now being located at the target. Did you mean to close this RM as consensus for the DAB like Talk:Henry Kessler (baseball) or did you intend this be relisted to see if there is consensus to make the place primary? Even if you did intend to close this is could just be left open anyway but the DAB has been supported by both participants (not counting nom) and the evidence given supports this. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I did not close because it was not expired yet. The dab page was not, strictly speaking, part of the move request. (t · c) buidhe 22:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – no primarytopic; leave dab at base name. Dicklyon (talk) 07:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per my evidence above, there's no primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.