Talk:Erasmus Mundus
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recreated
[edit]This article has been RECREATED and watched by the member signed below to emphasize the complete difference between the programme subject of this article and the sister programme presented in the article titled ERASMUS programme. over the next few months this article can be extended and edited and added to it the necessary information and updates. Regards. Mazim82 13:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC) )
- Just remember that this is an encyclopedia, not a recruitment facility. I excised a lot of uneccessary stuff from the original, but it is coming along OK. Just a hint, we don't type words all in caps, as you did within the article, and above with ERASMUS which is a redirect to Desiderius Erasmus anyway. I have removed your actual name from your post here. We only sign with our real name if that is our username. In your case, you sign with Mazim82 as above. Cheers. Moriori 19:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
IS IS APPROPRIATE ?
[edit]There are 103 EM programs (2004-2008) as evidenced from Ref.1. I think it is inappropriate that there is a section dedicated to two of them in this page. I suggest REMOVING these sections. Also the whole SEE ALSO section refers to Institutions related to these two programs and should be removed. The article should be about the Concept, not about its Instances!
--Ronchet (talk) 14:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- yeah maybe those should be put on seperate pages, with more emphasis on the programme and how it works here --Juxi (talk) 07:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- I agree Juxi. It's better to separate before it makes big mess. I think the article should be in convenience and demand. Wikipeida is already working as entrance gate to all information exist on Internet, which can be edited by anyone.Idea of Concept - Instance is clear in programming language. But, on wiki, I assume we can't say which is concept or instance as far as it exist in the real world and in our brain.
Yes its really important to have a separation of the specific masters description from the Erasmus Mundus page.
Euro Aquae
[edit]I'm suggesting merging Euro Aquae into this article because it seems that there are not enough third-party sources of Euro Aquae to justify its own article under Wikipedia's notability policies. If the articles are merged, then Euro Aquae can be put into context; if enough material surfaces to justify splitting the article, that can be done as well.
If the number of programmes is a concern, perhaps a page like List of Erasmus Mundus programmes might be a way to consolidate coverage without having tens of stub articles without much potential for expansion. --Gimme danger (talk) 18:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Could someone add IMMIT program to this article? www.immit.eu 61.17.252.110 (talk) 22:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Title
[edit]We should standardize the title naming convention, by de-capitalize the "Erasmus" word. --Guybrush1979 (talk) 08:23, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:31, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
ERASMUS Mundus → Erasmus Mundus — Naming convention. Should be "Erasmus Mundus" instead of ERASMUS Mundus. Guybrush1979 (talk) 02:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support. Also, I followed links on the page and ended up at SOCRATES programme. Should that be moved also? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zuiver jo (talk • contribs) 23:16, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Update needed
[edit]DG Education and Culture (European Commission) proposes to improve the Erasmus Mundus page by changing content and structure: - doctorates are not mentioned, neither are Action 2 and 3 of the programme - the list of masters gives some examples, but is not complete: it should be updated and put in the framework of http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Erasmus_Mundus_Programmes We drafted a text with some guidelines on the changes we suggest (http://ec.europa.eu/education/erasmus-mundus/doc/em.pdf) - the article should be "within the scope of WikiProjet European Union" EacDgCommission (talk) 09:52, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Page updated by DG Education and Culture (European Commission)
[edit]Following our comments on 23 September, we have updated the information on the Erasmus Mundus Programme. Our email address is eac-social-media@ec.europa.eu — Preceding unsigned comment added by EacDgCommission (talk • contribs) 13:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
unnecessary issues in my opinion This Erasmus Mundus has nothing to do with Erasmus program. even then it is tagged as an issue. I do not think that any one can have an objection for this. Accordingly, i have removed the issue from the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.110.246.22 (talk) 10:35, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorates are no longer offered
[edit]Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorates are no longer offered. Instead, this funding has been replaced by MSCA scholarships. We've kept this page to explain how the EMJD scheme used to work, but the information here is no longer updated.
https://www.findaphd.com/guides/erasmus-mundus Obada.j (talk) 17:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Not working links
[edit]this links are no longer available:
- Start-Class European Union articles
- Mid-importance European Union articles
- WikiProject European Union articles
- Start-Class Europe articles
- Unknown-importance Europe articles
- WikiProject Europe articles
- Start-Class education articles
- Unknown-importance education articles
- WikiProject Education articles
- Start-Class Science Policy articles
- Unknown-importance Science Policy articles