Talk:Epipremnum aureum

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Polynesia: French Polynesia Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the French Polynesia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Liana or not liana?

The linked article on lianas states that pothos is *not* a vine of this type. I have no expertise or opinion in the matter, but perhaps someone who does could resolve the contradiction? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.24.252.238 (talk) 17:46, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Epipremnum aureum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722145720/http://thakshana.nsf.ac.lk/pdf/JNSF26-34/JNSF29_1%262/JNSF29_1%262_35.pdf to http://thakshana.nsf.ac.lk/pdf/JNSF26-34/JNSF29_1%262/JNSF29_1%262_35.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your sighting

Hi @DixiePines: I think some of this is WP:OR. If I'm reading this correctly the pics you took are ok but adding your experience is not. If you can get your story repeated by someone else - get yourself interviewed by local news, or something - then I can add it. Invasive Spices (talk) 18:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an expert and it is hard to tell in the photos, but the pics don't look like Epipremnum aureum to me.Bcostley (talk) 22:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed dubious images

I have removed the images of "naturally flowering Taro vine" because of the fact that it cannot be confirmed to be Epipremnum aureum the leaves also do not appear to be the same type as in the picture "Overgrowing Udawattakele Forest in Sri Lanka". Bright (talk) 13:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also removed the unsourced sentence that states that a naturally flowering vine was found, per your edits. There is no verifiability in that claim. It seems that User:DixiePines added the photos and sentence based off of their own research. 49.204.113.230 (talk) 23:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding information about cultivars

A few months ago I added information about cultivars, but I would like to make it more comprehensive. I assume citations should be added as well, but I'm not sure how to do that with this in particular because of the nature of how they are named.

I could also add more photos as I have a bunch of cultivars in my collection. But I don't know if that would be useful.

I think it would also be cool to add photos of different cultivars in their "mature" state. But I'm not sure how to source photos for that. 3SiameseCats (talk) 15:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cultivars aren't always scientifically described like species, so I think as long as you have a citation to a houseplant book or other source, that sounds great. Let me know if you want any help. Steven Walling • talk 01:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Plant Propagation

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 August 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): IJR0209 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Snap-on c-130.

— Assignment last updated by Snap-on c-130 (talk) 17:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]