Talk:Ensignbus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ensignbus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on May 4, 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

London Transport Low‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Ensign Website

Company websites by their nature are promotional. If company's couldn't promote their products, most corporate websites wouldn't exist.

Granted Ensignbus' website is probably a bit more 'promotional' than other bus operators, but that is because they are also an active dealership. Certainly no more promotional than any other motor vehicle dealer.

Just look at Selfridges, Tesco and Toyota, their websites are all about promoting product. If you suggested these should be removed from their respective wiki pages for being 'unduly promotional' you'll be laughed out of town.Mo7838 (talk) 08:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links policy allows links to company websites to show how a company sees itself. It does not say we have to have them. This link has no encyclopedic merit whatever.--Charles (talk) 19:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Having revisited the site after 6 months, would still not describe it as overly promotional. Certainly no more promotional than the website of the 3 organisations listed above that all have their websites on their respective Wiki articles. Again the claim that the site should not be included on the basis of it being primarily advertising, is without foundation. Mo7838 (talk) 08:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not overly promotional? It is nothing but advertising and a bit of traffic news. It says nothing about the company or how it sees itself.--Charles (talk) 09:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This needs wider discussion. I have made a Request for comment at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Request board#Do companies have an automatic right to have a link to their website?.--Charles (talk) 09:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One of the reasons for not including bus operator's routes per not travel is that this information is available on an operator's website. So it is sensible to include a link to this information.[1]

Comparing Ensign's website to that of Brighton & Hove, Lothian Buses, First Great Western, Stena Line, EasyJet as random examples of transport operators, can't really see a difference in the content of the sites.

Yes there is a promotional element, that's what company websites exist for. But there is also a list of the services provided which is beneficial. [2] debunks the notion that the site says nothing about the company or how it sees itself. Mo7838 (talk) 10:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information is available on operators websites but that does not mean it is sensible to provide links to it. That drives a coach and horses through Wikipedia policy of avoiding advertising and promotion.--Charles (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I generally think we should link there site, I agree it's slightly promo but they're a dealer so is kind of expected, We started removing routes & telling everyone to sod off to the operators site .... but now they're being removed too ?? I suppose we could link to the route section of the site only ? ... Just a suggestion ... →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 18:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ensignbus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]