Talk:Enoteca Pinchiorri

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink: Foodservice / Michelin Guide Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Michelin Guide task force.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Untitled

I proposed this article for deletion. One of the editors claims that three stars on Michelin guide qualify for notability. I have some question about those criteria:

1) If this restaurant serves bad food on one week, does this change the criteria? 2) If Michelin downgrades the restaurant to two stars, does that change the notability? 3) If the chef leaves or the service changes, does that change the notability? 4) How does this differ from an advertisement? 5) Are all 3 star, 4 star, 5 star Michelin restaurants included in Wikipedia, and if not, then why not? 6) Should we include all two star restaurants?

I am still going to propose this article for deletion; I recommend it be placed in some place like Wikitravel. Two hundred years, perhaps two months, from now the notability of this restaurant may be nil; the entries in this encyclopedia should reflect things, persons, and events that are more numinous.

I sincerely think this does not fulfill the criteria for notability established by Wikipedia. I will wait 24 hours and then again request deletion. If that is contested, then I think it should rise to higher levels. The editor who is against deletion should find me a similar debate in Wikipedia that has followed his criteria. I am certain this has occurred before.

Baroque1700 (talk) 16:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as a four or five Michelin starred restaurant - three star is the top grade, only achieved by a very small number of restaurants (five in Italy in 2008[1]). For a restaurant to get three Michelin stars is the equivalent of a film getting an oscar, and invariably leads to significant coverage in reliable sources as the ones I have put in the article and many other books and newspaper articles. To answer your other points, this will not stop being notable if it loses its status. Notability is based on the sources that have written about a subject. Those sources won't be unwritten if the chef leaves or the restaurant loses a star. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:29, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1) Again, are all three star restaurants listed in Wikipedia? I apologize, I am not a star-crossed lover of restaurants and ignorant of Michelin standards. 2) You say it will not stop being notable if the quality changes, but your sources are mainly industry publications. I include Michelin guide as an industry publication. Why should not notability depend only on that fleeting qualification, and be subject to diminution. 3) How does this differ from an advertisement?

Finally, why does this restaurant have that makes it fit to be categorized among "buildings and structures of florence". You could move the restaurant to a different location and it would still be the same food? Why should it be catalogued amid the Laurentian Library or the Loggias in Venice? I still believe this is an inappropriate entry for an encyclopedia, and will proceed along the customary methods for deletion. I will remove it from some categories, if you are to alter that change, please provide ample justification. Baroque1700 (talk) 01:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Enoteca Pinchiorri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722064422/http://www.winenews.it/index.php?c=detail&dc=96&id=11944 to http://www.winenews.it/index.php?c=detail&dc=96&id=11944

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]