Talk:Emperor Duzong
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 1 August 2015
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved as proposed, without opposition. Clearly meets WP:CONCISE. bd2412 T 03:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Emperor Duzong of Song → Emperor Duzong
- Emperor Lizong of Song → Emperor Lizong
- Emperor Zhenzong of Song → Emperor Zhenzong
- Emperor Duanzong of Song → Emperor Duanzong
- Emperor Zhezong of Song → Emperor Zhezong
- Emperor Ningzong of Song → Emperor Ningzong
- Emperor Qinzong of Song → Emperor Qinzong
– Per WP:CONCISE, unnecessary disambiguation terms. Only if there is ambiguity like Emperor Renzong should "of Song" be added. I almost never see "of Song" in English-language books, see Google Ngram: [1], [2], [3] [4] etc., you may also do Google Book searches. Timmyshin (talk) 22:16, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support. "of Song" is neither part of the name, nor required for disambiguation. Gulangyu (talk) 09:05, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Emperor Zhenzong which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:01, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Family
[edit]Please cite references for the family. Fang Quanguang (talk) 00:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Potential neutral point of view violation
[edit]Certain portions of this article seem to violate WP:NPV, especially in the repeated claims of Emperor Duzong abandoning his duties. Some other examples of this include claims that his "intelligence was lower than a normal person", that his attempts to inquire into the state of the nation were merely a facade, and that historians find his ascension to the position of heir confusing. Although I do not know enough about this subject to properly correct this article, in my opinion it seems to break WP:NPV and so should be changed by someone with knowledge on this subject. AnOpenBook (talk) 02:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles
- Unknown-importance China-related articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject China articles