This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article was copy edited by Baffle gab1978, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on October 19, 2024.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Unfortunately, that's the only commentary found discussing the restaurant's history and description as of today. I write articles with the content that exists in a neutral manner, regardless if positive, neutral or negative, for example Pujol (restaurant)#Criticism. The history and description describe the restaurant in a neutral way. It is just about the dining and how the restaurant surged.
The IP that keeps disrupting the article, however, doesn't seem to understand the difference between WP:NOTPROMO and Wikipedia:Funding Wikipedia through advertisements. The article meets WP:NCORP (specifically WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS) and NOTPROMO: "Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery." Funding Wikipedia, the essay this person keeps using as a excuse to disrupt after multiple blocks, is about why Wikipedia doesn't add advert banners. It is also the same person that performed this edit to the Joe Biden 1988 presidential campaign, which is ironically questionable and reduces that editor's credibility.
Finally, Good article icons are not removed, even if the articles don't meet the good article criteria. There is a process (WP:GAR) that has to be fulfilled first.
If you or anyone (but I doubt that IP will do it) would like to start a GAR, AFD, or alike process (in the name of that IP person, which is what they seem to try to do when they say "This problem needs to be addressed in a serious administrative level", you can do it at the respective venues. Otherwise, the editor will continue disrupting until they get tired or the page results protected. (CC)Tbhotch™21:01, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]