Talk:Electroweak epoch

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Cosmology High‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Cosmology task force.

Citation needed for W and Z decay?

I don't agree that a citation is needed specifically for this. The lifetimes of the W and Z bosons is known to be short (see, for example, their individual articles); it's like requiring a citation for the statement "water is moist".216.70.243.82 (talk) 01:48, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article is just plain wrong

The article claims the Higgs Boson (as if we knew there was only one of them, which we don't) has been "demonstrated". That is just simply false. The LHC has determined that a particle which MAY BE the Higgs Boson (or a Higgs Boson) exists at an energy of ~126 GeV/c². As of January 2017, work is on-going to confirm that this particle has the properties that a Higgs particle must have. Until there is more information all we can reasonably say it that this particle "may be" or "is consistent with being" the Higgs particle.40.142.190.212 (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Physical science

Print 49.145.0.170 (talk) 13:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]