Jump to content

Talk:El Garces Intermodal Transportation Facility

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Construction Halt

[edit]

It looks as though the construction has stalled on the rehabilitation of this Hotel http://www.thedesertstar.com/articles/2011/11/09/news/local/news997.txt Lennny (talk) 21:42, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The naming of the various Harvey House articles

[edit]

There is a new move request which has ramifications to all the Harvey Houses. Please feel free to contribute your thoughts at Talk:Harvey_House_Railroad_Depot#Requested_move. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 14:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:El Garces Intermodal Transportation Facility/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 06:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opening Kingsif (talk) 06:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Style

[edit]
  • Lead a little long for the length of the article
  • Lead generally well written, but phrase several stops and starts perhaps a bit too non-encyclopedic for GA (though this arguably a part that can be trimmed anyway)
  • Original station good
  • Question - are Spanish missionaries not titled 'Padre' (instead of 'Father')
  • El Garces subsection otherwise good
  • Restoration good
  • There were a few punctuation errors - resolved
  • Nice work!
  • Needs attention - lead length and question on terminology

Coverage

[edit]
  • Some excessive coverage in the lead (also per style on MOS:LEADLENGTH) - there are some details that can be cut back to only the main overview. It's well written so I trust that editors/the nominator can identify places to trim effectively
  • Original station good
  • El Garces subsection good
  • Restoration good
  • The only section is on History, is there no other kind of coverage? Though legacy/impact seem to be incorporated into the history, I'd ask if there might be any appearances in popular culture, for example?
  • Needs attention - lead work and question on other potential

Illustration

[edit]
  • All images on commons
  • Good infobox, and suitable use of the collapse for former services
  • Good use of images, fair amount for length of article
  • Pass

Neutrality

[edit]
  • Fine
  • Pass

Verifiability

[edit]
  • Sources good
  • Everything cited in line
  • Pass

Stability

[edit]
  • History good
  • Pass
[edit]

Overall

[edit]
Thanks for taking the review! I combined a couple sentences in the lede, but I don't think there's much more than I can do without it missing out on major summary points. While it's a bit longer than typical for ~1000 words of main text, I don't think 11 sentences in 3 short paragraphs is disastrously long.
I changed Father to Padre to match the source. As for other sections, I don't think there's really anything else to add. Unlike some other stations I've brought to GA, there's not a complex platform configuration nor a laundry list of connecting services. Perhaps because of its remote location, I haven't seen any significant appearances in popular culture or so on. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:18, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the response, that makes it clear. I'll also note here that I saw the request for images on the talk page, but believe any more would be too saturated so I don't find that the images described would improve the article. Bearing in mind, happy to pass this. Kingsif (talk) 05:37, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]