Talk:Einstein manifold

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Physics: Relativity Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the relativity task force.

Dimension discussion

I would like to propose a section discussing how Einstein metrics behave by dimension, maybe something like:

2-dimensions -- Einstein metrics are constant curvature metrics -- so every closed surface has one.
3-dimensions -- Einstein metrics are constant curvature metrics -- so it is not difficult to tell if a 3-manifold admits an Einstein metric
4-dimensions -- Einstein metrics need not have constant sectional curvature (e.g. CP^2 with Fubini-Study metric). Some discussion on obstructions, including Hitchin-Thorpe inequality.
5-dimension and higher -- what little is known —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjauregui (talk • contribs) 17:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CP(n)

Please add the Einstein constant for the complex protective space. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.187.102.66 (talk) 13:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done 67.198.37.16 (talk) 05:57, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Einstein and Lorentz Manifold

What is the difference? As stated, the metric of an Einstein manifold can have an arbitrary signature. If that were all, then the Lorentz manifold would be a special case of the Einstein manifold? I'm going to guess that it isn't this way: I'm guessing that the manifolds of Einstein–Cartan theory are Lorentz manifolds, but not Einstein manifolds, since there is not only curvature, but also torsion. Could an expert please clarify this (with reference in the article)? Thanks a lot!--Ernsts (talk) 22:19, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lorentzian refers to the signature of the metric (-+++). Einstein requires the curvature to be proportional to the metric. These are not related to each other. In particular there are Lorentzian metrics which are not Einstein and Einstein metrics which are not Lorentzian. In general relativity one searches for Lorentzian Einstein metrics, and in Riemannian geometry one searches for Riemannian Einstein metrics, and so on. Tazerenix (talk) 08:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]