Talk:Edward S. Harkness House/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 22:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 22:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Well that was easy. I reviewed the whole page and only found one action item and a couple of very minor edits. Just a customary hold since this has sat so long to give the nominator time to look things over again. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:17, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes

The house's basement was damaged in 1924 after a water main broke, flooding the basement. Redundant phrasing: reword.

Oops, I have fixed this. Thanks for the review, @Sammi Brie. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing and spot checks

Reviewed: 2, 4, 17, 28, 44, 50, 63, 77 (A lot of specialty PQ I don't have access to this time, though the citations are to the right places.) To make up for this, I reviewed 18 and 42. No issues.

Images

All the photos are CC-licensed or public domain. I'm assuming the 1908 photo is so old enough it's PD anyway.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.