Talk:Edward S. Harkness House
Edward S. Harkness House is currently an Art and architecture good article nominee. Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 22:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: House in Manhattan, New York |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]
- ... that when the Edward S. Harkness House was built, its owner took the address from his neighbor? Source: Gray, Christopher (September 20, 1992). "Streetscapes: Sidestreet Prestige; When Cachet Was Off 5th Ave". The New York Times.
- ALT1: ... that when the Edward S. Harkness House was built, the address of the neighboring building had to be changed? Source: Gray, Christopher (September 20, 1992). "Streetscapes: Sidestreet Prestige; When Cachet Was Off 5th Ave". The New York Times.
- ALT2: ... that stained-glass windows at the Edward S. Harkness House were meant to cover up a blank wall? Source: "A Dignified Type of the City House". The New York Architect. Vol. 5, no. 3. March 1911. p. 32.
- ALT3: ... that the design of the Edward S. Harkness House was once described as being "entirely free from exaggeration"? Source: The New York Architect 1911, p. 31.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Allison Reese
Epicgenius (talk) 23:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The picture is fine and available to use, I see no sourcing issues with the article, its expansion is new enough, and I see no other problems preventing this from becoming a DYK. The first hook is the best one. @Epicgenius: Jon698 (talk) 01:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees awaiting review
- B-Class New York City articles
- Low-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- B-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- B-Class Historic sites articles
- Low-importance Historic sites articles
- WikiProject Historic sites articles
- Articles that have been nominated for Did you know