Talk:Economy of Moldova

Moldova Top‑importance

	Moldova portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikinews has an article I'm thinking of transwiking over here. wikinews:Moldova's brief major financial-economic news of the year of 2005 Do you think it will fit arrounds here. (probally on a seperate page.) Bawolff 21:04, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That one is much too huge... If you can select the most important info I support you.-- Bonaparte talk 21:25, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why the share of agriculture is indicated as 40% in the main text and as 20% in the table?

Please change first sentence

Why on earth does this article begin by making a comment about the physical size of Moldova - what has that got to do with the economy of Moldova? Wouldn't it be a a lot more appropriate to begin with the section that says that Moldova is the poorest country in Europe? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:43, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am referring to the opening words that say that Moldova is the second smallest of the Soviet republics and the most densely populated. It seems to me that that infomration should go in the article on Moldova, not here, and we should begin with a reference to how this country is the poorest country in Europe. Also, I do not think it approrpriate to say "It remains the poorest country in Europe" - just say it is the poorest country in Europe. ACEOREVIVED (talk)

Fiscal burden

How about updating information about current corporate income tax rate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.139.88.253 (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting information

"70% of total electrical energy power consumed in Moldova is imported from Ukraine and only 30% is produced in Moldova." with a later breakdown showing only about 20-25% of electricitty imports. This is probably info from different years and should be corrected with the most recent data available. 81.144.225.140 (talk) 07:59, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Currency Generation

I've checked online forums, asked on QA sites, and asked a couple of economists in Moldova, but no one seems to know how money is created in Moldova. UK has the central bank. Canada has the chartered banks and the bank of Canada to create money. Where and when is money created in Moldova? Perhaps there should be a diagram of the entire process of the Moldovan economy of how it works? 37.6.3.112 (talk) 22:22 PM, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Economy of Moldova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained Overview reversion.

Hello,

On Nov 20th I made an edit to this article adding parts of the Overview from the World Bank site. I then received a message on my </nowiki>user page stating:

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Economy of Moldova. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Styx (talk) 06:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think the text is public domain? S Philbrick (Talk) 01:01, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Styx & Stones: Adding ping

I then went to to do just that, yet the entire content was anyway removed by Sphilbrick. Why?

I want the World Bank information to be on this page because it is pertinent and authoritative, please inform me what I need to do to keep it.

Thank you. Dhyana b (talk) 16:28, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I need to see documentation that World Bank text is public domain. I don't think that's the case.

Their site is clearly marked to the bottom:

I am looking at this page, which I'm sure someone thought was a marvel of transparency, but it looks to me like bureaucracy gone amok.

It gets worse here.

If you can find something that definitively says the information you used is public domain or even acceptably licensed, please point it out, but I don't see it. S Philbrick (Talk) 01:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the page in question: The World Bank in Moldova has the following link at the bottom: Legal --> which in turn links to "Terms and Conditions of Using Our Site. There the text specifies:

"Terms and Conditions of Using Our Site

The World Bank Group and its officers, agents, employees, and content providers (referred to below as “The World Bank Group” or “we” or “us” or “our”) maintain this web site and/or any related site (such as a related mobile application) that links to these World Bank Group Terms and Conditions (the "Site") as part of efforts to provide broad public access to information. We encourage you to use the World Bank Group information and data it contains (the "Materials") as well as communications tools designed to facilitate this use. Your access to and use of the Site, the Materials, those communications tools, and any new tools made available by us that alter or improve your use of the Site or the Materials are subject to these World Bank Group Terms and Conditions, as well as any documents expressly incorporated by reference herein (collectively these “Terms and Conditions”).

[...] Those specific terms of use are available on the pages through which the relevant Materials are accessible, and are also collected here:

Terms of Use for Datasets

Terms of Use for the Open Knowledge Repository

Terms of Use for the World Bank Group Archives Photo Catalog

For the remainder of the Materials, you may make non-commercial uses thereof, but you may not make any derivative work or commercial use, including without limitation reselling them, charging to access them, charging to redistribute them, or charging for derivative works based on them, without the prior written consent of the relevant member institution(s). The foregoing limited license rights are conditioned upon your providing proper attribution to The World Bank Group, including the relevant member institution(s), the individual author(s) of the work, if any, and any third party content providers, consistent with the following format: “The World Bank Group authorizes the use of this material subject to the terms and conditions on its website, Legal.”

[...]

Use of the Site

Prohibited Uses:

You may use the Site only for lawful, personal and non-commercial purposes. The Site may contain tools that enable you to “Post” (i.e., upload, post, make available, communicate, send, share, or transmit) Materials (collectively referred to as “Interactive Tools”). You agree not to use the Site, including the Interactive Tools, to do any of the following:

Violate any applicable law or encourage or provide instructions to another to do so.
Defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten, or otherwise violate the legal rights (such as
rights of privacy and publicity) of others.
Post any infringing, obscene, indecent, or unlawful material or information.
Misrepresent your identity, including by impersonating the World Bank Group or any member institution or staff thereof.
Collect or store personal information about anyone.
Transmit, or procure the sending of, any advertising or promotional material [without our prior written consent], including any "junk mail", "chain letter" or "spam" or any other similar solicitation.
Provide any investment advice or otherwise violate applicable securities laws, or undertake or promote other commercial activities or sales, such as contests, sweepstakes and other sales promotions, barter or advertising.
Upload or attach files that contain viruses, corrupted files, or any other similar software or programs that may damage the operation of another's computer. Delete any author attributions, legal notices, or proprietary designations or labels in any file that is uploaded.
Falsify the origin or source of software or other material contained in a file that is uploaded.
Download any file posted by another User that you know, or reasonably should know, cannot be legally distributed in such manner.
Attempt to gain unauthorized access to, interfere with, damage or disrupt any parts of the Site, the server on which the Site is stored, or any server, computer or database connected to the Site.
Attack the Site via a denial-of-service attack or a distributed denial-of-service attack.

You further acknowledge that exchanges using Interactive Tools are public and not private communications. Therefore, any of your Posts will be considered available for public use and distribution as provided herein.

You represent and warrant that:

You own or control all rights in and to your Posts and have the right to grant the license granted above to us and our affiliates, business partners and service providers, and each of their and our respective licensees, successors and assigns.
All of your Posts do and will comply with these Terms and Conditions.

You understand and acknowledge that you are responsible for any of your Posts, that Postings by you and other users are not endorsed by The World Bank Group, and such Postings should not be considered reviewed, screened, or approved by The World Bank Group. The World Bank Group may or may not review Materials that you Post, but it shall have the right (but not the obligation) in its sole discretion to review, reject, or remove any and all Posts at any time for any or no reason whatsoever with or without notice to you.

You hereby grant each and all of the member institutions of The World Bank Group a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferrable, sub licensable, and non-exclusive perpetual license throughout the universe for use in any and all media whether now known or hereafter devised to use and exploit (including without limitation by reproduction, distribution, public display, adaptation, and/or public performance) any and all Materials that you Post."

End quote. This seems to me like giving permission & even encouraging the use of materials/information from their website, but without any warranty or liability placed on them as a result of such public posts. And as long as they're accurately cited as the source. -- Dhyana b (talk) 14:11, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Any license that restricts use to non-commercial purposes, as World Bank's does, is not compatible with Wikipedia, because we allow commerical re-use of our material. See WP:Compatible license for more information. DanCherek (talk) 17:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so in order to still use the information from the World Bank website, what do I need to do? This site is cited literally millions of times on Wikipedia, most likely. Dhyana b (talk) 20:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're allowed to use it as a source of information and cite it accordingly, but you need to summarize the information in your own words, not copy the text from the website. DanCherek (talk) 22:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But just to make it clear, using it as a source of information also must respect the 'non-commercial use' license, as per the terms and conditions. There is no exemption Dhyana b (talk) 16:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content from Wikipedia can be used non-commercially and commercially. There is almost no exception. Check WP:COPY. Thinker78 (talk) 23:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, you don't understand what I said -- the terms and conditions from the World Bank state that using any information from their site must respect their Terms & Conditions. Those terms & conditions prohibit the commercial use of most (if not all) material from them, including information:

<br>

"We encourage you to use the World Bank Group information and data it contains (the "Materials") ... you may make non-commercial uses thereof, but you may not make any derivative work or commercial use. [...] You may use the Site only for lawful, personal and non-commercial purposes."

<br>

What I'm trying to say is that citing the World Bank site as a source on Wikipedia already conflicts with the non-commercial policy that the WB has. Either that, or the terms do not apply in the way that you understand & are telling me here, bc it would mean the World Bank can never be cited as a source, at all, ever on Wikipedia. Dhyana b (talk) 07:14, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Written information can be used freely to an extent under certain conditions because of the Fair Use exception of copyright law. Wikipedia does not make commercial use of the information as far as I know. People or entities who reuse information found in Wikipedia should weigh whether particular extracts would be fair use for them or not.The bar to allow such reuse is higher when it is for commercial purposes but that's responsibility of such users. Per the terms of use, "Re-use of content that we host is welcome, though exceptions exist for content contributed under "fair use" or similar exemptions under copyright law". Thinker78 (talk) 20:39, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]