Talk:Economic and Political Weekly

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

India: Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Peer-reviewed?

Dos it fulfill Wikipedia's definition of academic journal? Fgnievinski (talk) 04:13, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a strangely complicated question to answer; how do you find a reliable source about a reliable source, from a country where such things are harder to come by in the first place? this seems to suggest that yes, it does. this makes it seem less certain, but still mentions that scholarship is published in it. I have personally used such scholarly work as sources on Wikipedia many times over; mainstream academics, even from the west, publish in it once in a while. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:26, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"adequate time has to be provided for internal reading and external refereeing. It can therefore take up to four months for a final decision on whether the paper for the Special Article section is accepted for publication." [1]. So, I think the answer is yes. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:37, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At WP:WikiProject Academic Journals, we normally accept self-declared peer review at face value. Fgnievinski (talk) 22:02, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems clear enough to me and no indications to the contrary, I have modified the article accordingly. --Randykitty (talk) 17:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Economic and Political Weekly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140116072553/http://www.pragoti.in/node/3103 to http://www.pragoti.in/node/3103

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]