Talk:Dragon Quest Builders

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (2 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (5 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Comparing this game to ActRaiser

Honestly in my opinion this game is closer to dark cloud than it is to minecraft or ActRaiser, but either way, the line, "according to Kotaku, Dragon Quest Builder is more akin to ActRaiser than Minecraft." is one guy's (incorrect) opinion. I honestly feel it's a little misleading, as DQB has portions of the game taken from each of those three. Minecraft's building, Dark Cloud's adventuring, quests, blueprints, and city construction, and very loosely ActRaiser's city siege by monsters. Either way, I think it's sufficient to list all three without opinions as to which one it is more like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delerium76 (talk • contribs) 02:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Publisher is Nintendo, not Square Enix on Nintendo Switch

According to official Nintendo Website (https://www.nintendo.com/games/detail/dragon-quest-builders-switch) the game is published by Nintendo on Nintendo Switch, not by Square Enix. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ensink (talk • contribs) 13:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 September 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 10:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Quest Builders: Alefgard o Fukkatsu Seyo → Dragon Quest Builders – Per WP:SUBTITLE and WP:COMMONNAME. Nearly all English-language reliable sources omit the subtitle. The1337gamer (talk) 13:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support as the page creator. --CAS222222221 (talk) 14:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Such plausibly uncontroversial moves should just be done, no need for an RM procedure if nobody's arguing. Per WP:BRD, if the move is reverted, an RM can then be started. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 15:43, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.