This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
An edit on 7 June by SquallDegu deleted commentary by Freedom4U and LordVoldemort728 on sourcing, either deliberately or accidentally, under the misleading edit summary "(New sources added)", immediately before submitting the AfC, which Rusalkii then accepted. I'm pasting the deleted material here, as it might suggest a need to reconsider. Subsequent edits have included an IP https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/2.127.83.225 who is a SPA contributor editing articles related to the author of the subject of this article (which tend to be edited by SPAs). Just flagging for community consideration. I've tried to make it more encyclopedic today, but it has multiple issues.
Comment: This article relies on references to unreliable sources, specifically blogs and other self-published content. See WP:NBOOK for notability guidelines regarding books and WP:RSSELF for information on why self-published content is not an acceptable source for Wikipedia. Freedom4U (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]