Talk:Down on Me (traditional song)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

2010

There is an article called Down On Me (song). The names should likely reflect that they are both songs. Suggestions? --DanielCD (talk) 19:56, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed per WP:SONGDAB. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:01, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 12:07, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

– Or any title that you may suggest. Do you think this stub deserves to be the primary topic? Or a Jeremih song deserves it? Or neither of those? Is it awkward that a stub is a primary topic? You judge by giving comments below. j3j3j3 ...pfH0wHz 16:19, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion; Move the Jeremih song to "Down on Me", keep the disambiguation page as-is, and redirect the 1920s song to the disambiguation page. This article has been unsourced for over four years, and does not appear to be noteworthy enough for its own article. WikiRedactor (talk) 20:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, let's see about that. j3j3j3 ...pfH0wHz 13:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ - (no edit conflict, but WikiRedactor's comments above weren't there 20 minutes ago). I already moved the WP:RECENT Jeremih song to artist name per WP:SONGDAB and sourced, expanded this article, plus (more important than title) added a jpg. I'm all in favour of clear titling - but for once we have a song here that actually is notable as a song, more notable than the artist, even more notable than Janis Joplin probably. Moving it to (1920 song) is out since it isn't confirmed as 1920, it may be 1890s, (Janis Joplin song) is problematic since (Big Brother and the Holding Company song) is technically correct, even though this is Janis Joplin arrangement and her backing band at this point, and then re-recorded without them. I would say leave as is. This is one of the 5% of songs where the song really is notable in its own right.In ictu oculi (talk) 22:46, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest Down on Me (freedom song) if this is moved, as it is described thusly in the article -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 06:17, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, it's okay for that. As long as this is moved. j3j3j3 ...pfH0wHz 13:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Down on Me (traditional song) would be safer than (freedom song) In ictu oculi (talk) 15:52, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is also okay as well. I also prefer that. j3j3j3 ...pfH0wHz 13:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then provided it is Down on Me (traditional song) rather than (1920s song), and provided Nom will clean up what links here then Mild Support. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and WP:SONGDAB. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:39, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.