Doomben railway line is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport
Originally, the start of this page is meant to read,
"The Doomben railway line is a railway line in the City of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. It is the part of the Pinkenba railway line that still operates a regular passenger service."
So can anyone explain why it now reads, "The Pinkenba railway line is a railway line in the City of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. It is the part of the Doomben railway line that still operates a regular passenger service."? 124.149.132.120 (talk) 07:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that in this edit, another IP editor changed it to match the physical line name and not the QR service line name. I've changed it back as it doesn't make grammatical/logical sense that the "Pinkenba line is part of the Doomben line", but otherwise I don't really have an opinion on whether the article name should be the QR service name or the physical line's name - but probably under WP:COMMONNAME, the name Doomben might be best (I've haven't looked for any sources to back this up though). Pinging @Kerry Raymond: just to let you know as you edited after the edit mentioned - I've just placed a general refimprove tag for the entire article rather than individually doing it. Fork99 (talk) 09:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]