Talk:Divine Savior Holy Angels High School
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daycare Comment
[edit]"The school was recently recognized by a prestigeous local institution as the number one day care in the nation."
Could we add this to criticisms of the school?
- No. It is uncited and bogus. --Yamla 20:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- It is part of a play from a prestigeous local instituion, and I can cite it from someones blog. citation. See, its not bogus.
Citations!!
[edit]There are little if no citations on this page! Puckmv 05:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
[edit]I noticed today the content has been flagged as a potential conflict of interest. I am a historian and educator by profession, with a PhD in Modern European History. In history, the most accurate accounts are from eyewitnesses or primary sources. This history is based on both. One of my sources was indeed myself, Angela Pienkos, chief administrator of DSHA (1976-1997), so of course I had a close connection. However, Angela Pienkos has not received any compensation from the school since 1997. She has no financial relationship with this topic. I felt that the history was lacking in information about the origins/foundations of the school, as well as its subsequent development. I believe I am ideally qualified to speak about the details of the 21 year period that was so crucial to the school's continued existence. . --Angelapienkos (talk) 23:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Please read the Wikipedia conflict of interest guideline. (It was linked on the notice on your talk page.) See why someone affiliated with the subject of an article is considered to have a conflict of interest, even if s/he has no financial relationship with that entity. Then, if you still feel you have no conflict of interest per WP guidelines, take your plea to the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard. (This comment duplicated on Angelapienkos's talk page). 32.218.40.152 (talk) 05:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yes--and in general, Angelapienkos, if it's not verified by reliable (secondary) sources, it's considered original research. Sorry, but that's how Wikipedia works. Drmies (talk) 05:45, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Divine Savior Holy Angels High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090429033455/http://www.advanc-ed.org:80/schools_districts/school_district_listings/? to http://www.advanc-ed.org/schools_districts/school_district_listings/?
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)