Talk:Distributivity (order theory)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Distributivity (order theory) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I've copied much of the "Distributivity laws for complete lattices" section into an new article completely distributive completely distributive lattice and marked it as a stub. Perhaps it would be better to call the new article complete distributivity or completely distributive lattice, but I used the link used in this article as a starting point. Please help make that article better and, in particular, add citations. --Malcohol 08:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- In the light of this, I'm planning on removing much of the more specific content on complete distributivity from this article. Are their any objections to this?--Malcohol 09:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
The definition of distributive semilattice is always satisfied in any lattice. Just take a'=x and b'=x. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.241.83 (talk) 01:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- No, it might be the case that and are incomparable to but nonetheless . A specific counterexample can be found by considering the lattice .82.19.52.143 (talk) 21:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)