Talk:Disability classification in sailing

HOPAU Low‑importance

	This article is related to the History of the Paralympic movement in Australia. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.HOPAUWikipedia:GLAM/History of the Paralympic movement in AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject HOPAUHistory of the Paralympic movement in Australia-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Olympics: Paralympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Paralympics task force. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Disability

Disability classification in sailing is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Sailing Low‑importance

	Disability classification in sailing is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 1

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 19:54, 4 October 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Sailing classification → Disability sailing classification – This is not about sailing classification in general, it is classification for disabled sailors, so is very misleading, since sailing has a great many types of classification, such as boat size, crew size, number of hulls, etc. The redirect should be deleted after hte move. 76.65.128.252 (talk) 11:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. No prejudice against a new RM with "Disability classification in sailing" as the proposed title. Jenks24 (talk) 04:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disability sailing classification → Sailing classification – This is the common name. The literature does not refer to the sport as disability sailing. Beyond that, there is no classification system for sailing. LauraHale (talk) 01:44, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose this has nothing to do with classification of sailing in general, and only deals with the classification of sailing in disabled sport contexts. There is nothing in this article that covers general classifications of sport sailing, such as by age, or gender, or mixed-gender groups, or skill level. There is nothing about the laser class or sprint class or other sized hulls or crew sizes or monohulls or catamarans or match racing or fleet racing or multiday -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 06:29, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The article is clearly not about sailing in general. It would not fit in sailing. And the name for the article that is being discussed would be Sailing classes. Classes =/= Classification. They are separate. No confusion. --LauraHale (talk) 09:47, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - wikt:classification is the manner of placing things in classes. As you state that this isn't about sailing in general, it should not have a generic name. Hull classification is one of the primary divisions in general sailing, and sport sailing. And historically, sail configuration is also a primary form of classification, dividing things such as xebecs, brig-sloops, brigs, sloops, etc. -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 04:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Misleading, as it would imply that all players are covered. --Stfg (talk) 10:04, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- As what is being classified is the disabilities, not the sailing, a better title might be Disability classification in sailing. --Stfg (talk) 12:56, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: There are other types of sailor classification such as the ISAF Sailor Classification which is todo with whether your a professional or not the term disabled maked it clear what this is link to. --User:Yachty4000 (talk) 12:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per guidelines on precision in article titles and points made by Yachty4000 and Stfg. No objections to Stfg's proposed title. Graham87 15:11, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Only refers to disabled sport, so needs to be specific to avoid confusion. Of course there's classification in able-bodied sailing - there are many different classes. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - "Sailing classification" is extremely misleading.

I see this is part of a broader campaign to go against recently decided moves:

—Diiscool (talk) 14:17, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had been wondering about that, too. Wouldn't a better approach be to run an RFC on a standard title form for all these articles about classification of disabilites? This would also save each of us from having to ferret around to discover if there are any more, and all individual moves could be done uncontroversially. --Stfg (talk) 19:45, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no. WP:COMMONNAME is the proper policy. Saying there will be confusion is like saying "Football blindfolds" should be be redirected to Association football, because people might think able bodied footballers use blindfolds instead of say theoretically "Five-a-side football" where blindfolds are used. Classification is not a word used on the able bodied version of any of these sports. Classes are not classification. Common-name should trump. I'm not adverse to Para-SPORT classification as that is more common. But disability is not in compliance with WP:COMMONNAME. That policy should trump "People might be confused by the use of a term that is not used in the sport that they will not likely find linked on the main page." Where would Racquetball classification redirect to in the racquetball? Racquetball classification -> [[Para-racquetball classification] yes. Racquetball classification -> Racquetball, no. You don't redirect pages to non-existent terms in a sport. --LauraHale (talk) 20:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You said "Classification is not a word used on the able bodied version of any of these sports". I can't speak for the other sports, because I don't follow them. In sailing, "classification" is not used solely for disabled sailing, hence the need for an unambiguous article title. You might start by reading this: http://members.sailing.org/classification/. You should stop throwing around the WP:COMMONNAME argument and perhaps invoke the WP:COMMONSENSE one. —Diiscool (talk) 00:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that. It is disabilities, not sports, whose classification is being described in these articles, and WP:COMMONNAME doesn't in the least mandate these misleading terms. Imho "racquetball classification" is a meaningless expression, and the redirect itself is undesirable. And I don't understand at all why half a dozen separate move proposals, in which the same arguments have to be rehearsed over and over, is better than an overarching RFC. --Stfg (talk) 09:39, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is under discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion#Sailing_classification -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 06:48, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Disability judo classification which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Disability classification in sailing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160816144150/https://www.paralympic.org/sites/default/files/document/160404093217097_Classification+Guide+-+updated+version_0.pdf to https://www.paralympic.org/sites/default/files/document/160404093217097_Classification+Guide+-+updated+version_0.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Disability classification in sailing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120815080227/https://www.paralympic.org.au/sports-amp-classification/summer-sports/summer-sports to http://www.paralympic.org.au/sports-amp-classification/summer-sports/summer-sports

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]