Talk:Ding ware
Appearance
A fact from Ding ware appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 October 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move
[edit](Sigh)
Well, "Ding ware" is a terrible name for these products since the standard for these pages is "~ porcelain" (cf. Vincennes porcelain, Kraak porcelain, &c) and the name should equally apply to ding cauldrons... but apparently it's simply accepted as a phrase in reference to Chinese products. Google Scholar has 19 'porcelain's to 198 'ware's. Blehhh... — LlywelynII 08:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Probably because a high proportion of sources DON'T describe them as porcelain at all, but as stoneware - see the article. "Fooware" is the best and most widely-used term for all such broad categories. Johnbod (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
- 定窯, 金代, 捧盒, ding ware, dessert box, Jin Dynasty, glaze, Ceramics, Pottery, 009.jpg
- 定窯, 金代, 茶罐, ding ware, tea jar, Jin Dynasty, glaze, Ceramics, Pottery, 7062 04.jpg
- 定窯, 金代, 軍持瓶, ding kiln ware, Kundika bottle Jin Dynasty, Ceramics, Pottery, 1632 07.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:46, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class China-related articles
- Unknown-importance China-related articles
- C-Class China-related articles of Unknown-importance
- C-Class Chinese history articles
- Unknown-importance Chinese history articles
- WikiProject Chinese history articles
- WikiProject China articles
- C-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles