Talk:Dignitary tort
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Requested move 21 July 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 21:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Dignitary torts → Dignitary tort – Per WP:SINGULAR. 142.160.89.97 (talk) 18:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 02:19, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support Rreagan007 (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- I suppose it's fine either way. I note that both Tort and Intentional tort are at the singular titles. bd2412 T 01:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- I will support, to avoid a continuing absence of consensus following the relisting, to create consistency with other "tort" titles. bd2412 T 12:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- My initial thoughts were that Dignitary 'torts' is more correct than 'tort'. But I can't say for sure. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support likewise for consistency with other titles. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:40, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.