Talk:Digital nomad

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Sorry, but this whole article reads like ad copy.

This looks like a made-up definition for the external spam links. IMHO the correct term is [Global nomad] (186.15.75.118 (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 13 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Spacefairy5.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article improvement

User at 9 July 2013 claims without supporting facts that the term 'digital nomad' is fabricated, yet several of the supporting external pages are news articles & blog editorials that establish the term as being in common use, as well as a link to the individual who coined the term. The external page links are NOT spam. Therefore, I suggest that the {POV} tag be removed and replaced with a tag for {cleanup}.

I also suggest that those who are unfamiliar with this new social phenomenon watch the introductory video and read the accompanying article here: A Quick Intro to Technomadia.com 98.158.68.2 (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently working on creating a new section for this article that focuses on "things to consider" in the digital nomadic lifestyle. Furthermore, I have added some information including paraphrases and citations to existing sections within the article. Spacefairy5 (talk) 03:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently preparing to add new sections to this article. I have made a "things to consider" section, a "History" section, and a "destinations to reconsider" section within the existing "popularity" section. I plan to put my "history" section under the existing section "definition." I plan to put my "things to consider" section under the existing "popularity" section. Finally, I plan on putting my "destinations to reconsider" section within the existing "popularity" section under the "popular destinations" subsection. Spacefairy5 (talk) 20:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering why entire sections were recently removed from this article? The "history" and "things to consider" sections both had citations. Additionally, the "destinations to reconsider" section was backed up by citations. Spacefairy5 (talk) 22:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Spacefairy5[reply]

'Has citations' isn't the only criteria for Wikipedia content. Your additions were more of a howto or an essay written to give advice to people who are considering becoming nomads. That might be interesting, but it isn't an encyclopedia article. See WP:NOTHOWTO for more. - MrOllie (talk) 22:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Much earlier known use is a book title from 1993

Powerbook: the digital nomad's guide. Everything the modern road warrior needs to turn the Macintosh powerbook into the complete mobile habitat.

https://www.worldcat.org/title/powerbook-the-digital-nomads-guide-everything-the-modern-road-warrior-needs-to-turn-the-macintosh-powerbook-into-the-complete-mobile-habitat/oclc/26974958

Udo Schmitz (talk) 13:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

search in metager.de with the search term:

"Digital Nomad" oder "digital nomad" "1993" "powerbook" -site:amazon.de -site:amazon.com -site:amazon.in

delivers

openlibrary.org/books/OL1735522M/Powerbook

Powerbook by Andrew Gore, 1993, Random House edition, in English.

{Here is the year directly visible}

Ping welcome, Steue (talk) 13:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Search in metager.de with the searchterm: "Digital Nomad" "digital nomad" "1993" -site:amazon.de -site:amazon.com -site:amazon.in delivered (as the 21st result):

{Note: bolded by Steue}
Resources for Aspiring Digital Nomads — TRIXIE PACIS von Yahoo trixiepacis.com/resources/digital-nomad-resources are you an aspiring digital nomad? The term was first coined in 1993 by Andrew Gore and Mitch Ratcliffe. The duo wrote Random House guide books about…

ping welcome, Steue (talk) 13:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technogypsie

I redirected Technogypsie to point here. There had been an article there which may have content that could be merged here. Daask (talk) 23:06, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Unknown whether before 1997 ??"

A simple search (I did it in metager.de) with:
"Digital Nomad" "1996"
{the quotation marks are supposed to ensure that *both* terms are part of each result.}
revealed, already as the first (non-commercial) result:
Kaplan C (1996) Questions of travel. Duke University Press, Durham. Book Google Scholar Kong D, Schlagwein D, Cecez-Kecmanovic (2019)

And a further "search *within* this domain" (again in metager) delivered:
The digital nomad – a mobile knowledge worker equipped with digital technologies to work “anytime, anywhere” (Kleinrock 1996),

Ping welcome, Steue (talk) 13:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Digital nomad visas

Hey everyone! I began creating separate sections for country-specific digital nomad visas. The list still needs to be added to but is underway. I also agree with some previous comments that portions of the article read like ad copy, so this might need to be cleaned up in the future. Let me know your thoughts. CroissantAvenue (talk) 21:42, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Croissant Avenue[reply]

Pretty much this whole section is about visas for remote workers who are staying in *one* place but employed elsewhere rather than *nomads*. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.152.252.252 (talk) 15:28, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 16 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): TsunamiSurfer777 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by TULIPMANETANE (talk) 04:12, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Technogypsie" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Technogypsie has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 28 § Technogypsie until a consensus is reached. GnocchiFan (talk) 22:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

capitalization of "internet"

Having noticed some mixture of lower- and uppercase spellings of "internet" on this page, I wondered if Wikipedia has a set policy on the question. There is an article (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Capitalization_of_Internet) that seems to favor "Internet," yet without explicitly commenting on Wikipedia's position (if there is one). Is there? I suggest that, as a matter of style, we at least have consistent use within a given page. What say we? Jorjulio (talk) 14:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any guidance in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Computer science. I think it'd be fine to make it consistent within the article if you want. The article you linked has a chart that makes it look like it's about 50/50 in the wild, so flip a coin :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]