Talk:Digital automatic coupling

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Strength

The digital coupler can handle trains up to 700m in length. How many tonnes is this? How many axles is this? ----MountVic127 (talk) 03:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In Australia trains using Alliance couplings can be 1800m long and so many tonnes in weight and climb 3% or 2.5% grades. Can DAC handle such gradients? ----MountVic127 (talk) 02:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice start. Needs more references that aren't the one manufacturer..

North8000 (talk) 14:52, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

German overengineering

Any reference for that? Guidod (talk) 10:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]